Right Realism (New Right) explanations of crime and deviance
Teacher recommended
?- Created by: Ash-Ketchum
- Created on: 03-11-15 10:38
Other questions in this quiz
2. Which Right Realists' explanation is callled 'Broken windows' and why?
- Wilson - More crime when social control breaks down, incivilities (liter, vandalism) are kept low by others reaction, once that stops serious crime takes over - once one broken window in abandoned building, they all are
- Herrnstein - More crime when social control breaks down, incivilities (liter, vandalism) are kept low by others reaction, once that stops serious crime takes over - once one broken window in abandoned building, they all are
- Jones - More crime when social control breaks down, incivilities (liter, vandalism) are kept low by others reaction, once that stops serious crime takes over - once one broken window in abandoned building, they all are
3. Which New Right thinks something is resdponsible for the development of the underclass and what is it?
- Marsland - Welfare dependency (undermined sense of commitement and obligation to support each other, prefer benefits to work)
- Murrray - Welfare dependency (undermined sense of commitement and obligation to support each other, prefer benefits to work)
- Marsland - Employers not hiring w/c people in inner cities (undermined sense of commitement and obligation to support each other, prefer m/c to w/c)
4. What are the four controls (Hirschi) and how do we get them and what does it imply?
- Attachment, Commitment, Belief, Involvement - Get them as get older so younger peole have less to lose so commit more crime - Imply that youth, ethinic minorities, underclass more criminal as lack controls
- Ritualism, Retreatism, Conformism - Get them as get older so younger peole have less to lose so commit more crime - Imply that youth, ethinic minorities, underclass more criminal as lack controls
- Individualistic, Safety valve, Rebelism - Get them as get older so younger peole have less to lose so commit more crime - Imply that youth, ethinic minorities, underclass more criminal as lack controls
5. What did Wilson and Herrnstein say about crime?
- It is inevitable. Jones - More liekly to commit crime if not socialised into acceptable behaviour, certain traits (impulsiveness, no empathy, etc) in more criminals, families with low intelligence dont socialise right so more criminals
- It is inevitable. Wilson - More liekly to commit crime if not socialised into acceptable behaviour, certain traits (impulsiveness, no empathy, etc) in more criminals, families with low intelligence dont socialise right so more criminals
- It is inevitable. Herrnstein - More liekly to commit crime if not socialised into acceptable behaviour, certain traits (impulsiveness, no empathy, etc) in more criminals, families with low intelligence dont socialise right so more criminals
Comments
No comments have yet been made