Interactionist Explanations of Crime and Deviance 0.0 / 5 ? SociologyCrime and devianceA2/A-levelAQA Created by: steeeephtaylorCreated on: 31-05-15 12:21 Who said that there is no such thing as a deviant act because no act is inherently criminal or deviant in itself, only when it is labelled as such. Howard Becker 1 of 10 What is the term for something that is made up of groups such as the police, the judiciary, social workers and probation workers? Agents of social control 2 of 10 What do interactionists believe deviance is due to? Labelling 3 of 10 Who stated the idea of primary and secondary deviance? Edwin Lemert 4 of 10 what is secondary deviance the result of? Societal reaction 5 of 10 What is the term for when society interprets all actions and motives in the context of the label? Master status 6 of 10 What is the consequence of treating someone as a deviant? Self-fulfilling prophecy 7 of 10 Who says that a deviant is simply someone to whom a label has been successfully applied to? Becker 8 of 10 What does Becker say the behaviour of the less powerful is subjected to? Greater surveillance 9 of 10 Who argues that the labelling theory is guilty of over-romanticising deviance and blaming the agencies of social control for causing crime? Left Realists 10 of 10
Assess the view that crime and deviance are the products of the labelling process (essay 21/21) 0.0 / 5
Comments
No comments have yet been made