The Nile Valley

?
  • Created by: Lucyplatt
  • Created on: 27-06-20 14:23

The Nile Valley 1882-98

  • Appeared to be a complete u-turn in policy for Gladstone (PM), the champion of cheap government, low taxation- anti imperialist.
  • Ottoman Empire captured Egypt in 1517 and expanded its hold along the North African coast. By the 19th century it was in decline.
    • Worried British ministers and PM
    • If the Ottoman Empire collapsed, other European powers would benefit and gain territory. 
    • Not to British advantage.
  • The way the Ottoman Empire was governed was at the heart of the problem. 
  • It was a huge empire, ruled on its periphery by princes and sultans.
  • Like all empires without rapid communication, it devolved power to local rulers.
  • Resulted in challenges as its satellie rulers sought autonomy.
1 of 24

Khedives

  • Khedives in Egypt enjoyed a great deal of political freedom.
  • From the 1850s they had increasingly relied on European financial investment from France and Britain. 
  • 1863-70, Egypt's foreign debt went from £3 mil to £100 mil, khedive bankrupt 1875-.76.
  • Britain and France established a system of financial control for Egypt- Dual Control.
  • Forced Ismail Pasha (khedive) to introduce financial reforms- cutting army pay, sales taxes on food/goods.
  • They reduced the interest paid on foreign debt to 5%, supervised by the internationalcommission, Caisse de la Dette.
  • Khedive deposed in 1879.
  • Sultan was persuaded by the British to replace him with Khedive Ismail's son, Tewfik Pasha.
2 of 24

Arabi Pasha + nationalism

Colonel Ahmed Urabi (Arabi Pasha) was a nationalist officer in the Egyptian army who led a group of army officers in protest against Tewfik and Britain + France. 

Dissatisfaction with dual control existed among all Egyptian bourgeoisie. Initial focus was the issue of army pay.

This widened into a nationalist platform- 'Egypt for the Egyptians' and the Egyptian Nationalist Party was formed in 1879. 

In 1879, Arabi led a coup following the attempt to dismiss 2,500 army officers and halve salaries of the remainder. He successfully forced Tewfik to appoint a nationalist ministry.

The British and French feared that he would next force Tewfik to repudiate the loans and ignore the financial measures the dual control had insisted on. 

3 of 24

Protecting European interest pt.1

Strategic:

  • Trade route to India through Suez Canal
  • Dramatically shortened the journey to India
  • 80% of shipping that travelled through was carried by British ships
  • Clear Anglo-French rivalry and cooperation over investment protection
  • Disraeli purchased 45% of shares in 1875 from the bankrupt khedive

Trade:

  • The Egyptians provided an important and growing market for British interests
  • By 1880, Britain purchased 80% of Egypt's exports and supplied 44% of Egypt's imports
  • British exports to Egypt was about 5% of its total exports
  • During the American Civil War, Britain switched to Egyptian cotton but reverted in 1865- exacerbated Egyptian economic difficulties
4 of 24

Protecting European interest pt.2

Financial:

  • British bond-holders in the City of London were heavily exposed to any failure by Egypt to pay its debts.
  • The British government were responsive to the demands of the City of London that Egypt must pay its ddebts to bond-holders.
  • As much as 37% of Gladstone's personal fortune was invested in Egyptian loans.
  • 1875- Britain + France established financial control via Dual Control.

People:

  • In the short term, Britain could claim the intervention was necessary to prevent European loss of life...
  • 11 June 1882, Britain and France anchored off Alexandria, a city of 232,000, every 1/5 were European. Tensions in the city boiled over- a row between an Egyptian boy and a Maltese man escalated in anti-Christian riots.
  • At least 50 Europeans and 250 Egyptians were killed. 
5 of 24

French withdrawal

  • 1882, British + French issued the Gambetta Note: stated that the two regarded the maintenance of the khedive's power as the best guarantee for order and prosperity.
  • Intended to warn the nationalists who responded by forcing a nationalist cabinet on the khedive and threatened to dipose him. France + Britain fearing that Arabi would repudiate Egyptian debt payments and determined to protect bond-holders sent warships in May.

However, the French committment did not result in actual participation. When the bombardment of Alexandria began in July, French ships did not participate or offer support.

Reasons:

  • The actions of Bismarck (German chancellor) indicated that Germany had changed its position & was no longer willing to support dual action. France could not argue (Germany defeated them 1870). Bismarck + Great Powers stated there should be no change in Egypt.
  • French internal politics meant that on 30 Jan 1882, Leon Gambetta fell from power, replaced by Charles dde Freycinet who was less inclined towards Egyptian intervention.

However- not a total withdrawal. They were frustrated by growing British control and saw themselves with strategic interest in North Africa.

6 of 24

The British military campaign

Britain had followed the French lead to the joint expedition as they were unwilling for France to have more influence than Britain in the region. 

They then found themselves in an uneasy position of acting unilaterally when the French refused to sanction the bombardment of Alexandria.

  • January 1882: Gambetta Note
  • 20 May: Anglo-French fleet sails for Alexandria
  • 11 June: Anti-Christian riots in Alexandria, Arabi Pasha fortifies it
  • 11 July: Britain begin bombardment
  • 12 September: Pasha defeated at Tel el-Kebir
  • 3 December: Pasha exiled to Ceylon, Tewfik restored
  • 1883: Evelyn Baring returns as Consul General
7 of 24

Historical interpretations

Robinson and Gallagher- 'Africa and the Victorians: The Official Mind of Imperialism' 1961:

They argued that there was no period of anti-imperialism in the 19th century and that Britain pursued an imperialist policy through informal empire when possible, formal when necessary. They identified local crises as drawing Britain to Africa, Egypt being important due to the Suez Canal.

Cain and Hopkins 1993:

Placed the importance of bond-holders and captital investment by the City of London at the centre of the occupation.The national interest was determined by the City of London as the politicians defining national interest were investors in Egyptian loans. Therefore, the city's interests became national interests.

National historians of Egypt- Al Sayyid Marsot:

Explore the social and economic tensions caused by the modernisation of the khedives and the birth of nationalism in Egypt.

8 of 24

Why was Egypt controlled by the British?

Never intened at the outset to be permanent and Gladstone reiterated constantly that as soon as financial stability was assured, Britain would withdraw. However, they remained there for 32 years.

Why?

  • The defeat in November 1883 of an Egyptian army under William Hicks, who entered the khedives service 1882, by radical jihadist forces under the mahdi in Sudan, Muhammad Ahmad
  • Nature of the British administrator Sir Evelyn Baring and his agenda
  • The defeat of Gladstone over Irish home rule in 1886
  • Dominance of Lord Salisbury

The Veiled Protectorate:

A term used for 1882-1914 in Egypt. 

It technically remained a province of the Ottoman Empire and the khedive's British advisers who effectively ran the country, had no legal authority. 

9 of 24

Baring's 'Mission in Egypt'

'Temporary occupation' -> maintained by the fact Egypt was a province of the Ottoman Empire.

However... the khedive was unable to make political decisions without the agreement of the British consul general, with increasingly large numbers of British appointees in Egyptian administration and army.

Sir Evelyn Baring was the British consul general in Egypt from 1883 until 1907.                     

A key factor to continuity- he believed that there needed to be fundamental changes made in the agricultural infrastructure and governmental institutions of the country. 

10 of 24

Evelyn Baring

  • Lord Baring- descendent of the great banking dynasty.
  • Had early imperial experience in India.
  • He was convinced of the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon and had little patience with what he believed to be the 'oriential' mind.
  • He was convinced that the future of Egypt rested on developing its agriculture and a large proportion of his time in Egypt was devoted to improving drainage for agriculture.
  • He was in many ways an example of the late Victorian imperialist.
  • He was fair, hard working, paternalistic, patriotic- imperial and confident of Britain's place in the world. 
  • He set out to reform the administrative and agricultural systems to place the economy on a firm footing. 
  • He believed not only that Britain had the right to intervene in Egypt but that it was there to reform.
11 of 24

Achievements of Baring's reforms

Through stringent financial controls and cuts in public spending, Baring restored the government of Egypt to solvency by 1887.

The London Convention of 1885 agreed a loan of £9 million to Egypt and £8 million was spent on stabilising the debt situation.

Baring spent the left over £1 milion on irrigation and cleaning the silted drainage canals of the Nile's flood plains to improve agriculture.

Between 1882 and 1902 8% of government revenue was devoted to agriculture and hydraulic improvements. 

12 of 24

Weaknesses of Baring's reforms

Baring's budget was allocated to debt repayments, military, irrigation etc. so other spending was limited and progress was slow or non-existent. 

British land and tax officials argued that the tax system should be equalised to prevent rebellion and promote agricultural investment by farmers, improving output. However, Baring constrained by other budgetary demands and cautious of upsetting landowners, put off taxation reform. (Agriculture held back by inequal land tax system) 

Investment in education was also limited'not government responsibility'. Baring refused to fund secondary education and in 1901 raised tuition fees in primary schools to decrease enrolment.

Greatest weakness- his complete underestimation of the strength of nationalism in Egypt. Baring was hugely irritated by the plots and intrigues at the khedive's court and tended to lay the blame for any displayed nationalism at the door of the khedive.

Baring remained oblivious to the significance of the growth of fellahin nationalism. He believedhis reforms had brought warm gratitude.

Left for retirment in 1907.

13 of 24

Sudan

The problems emerging in Sudan wre a result of changes within the relationship between the Egyptians and the Ottoman Empire.

From 1821, Egyptian control over the Sudan had changed from charging the Sudanese leader a tribute to formal occupation and administrative control.

In 1873, khedive Ismail, as part of his modernisation programme, appointed General Gordon as governor to end the slave trade.

Gordon made good progress but the impact of his work proved destabilising to the economy and the control of society through traditional groups. Gordon resigned in 1880.

  • The rise of the mahdi (promised redeemer of the Islamic world) in 1881 was a further factor to destabilisation. He capitalised on Sudanese resentment about Egyptian taxes and authority. 
  • His support grew rapidly. 
  • The Egyptian army launched a number of operations against the mahdi- unsuccessful, culminated in the wiping out of the 1883 expedition (Hicks)
14 of 24

The emergence of radical Islam in the Sudan

The emergence of radical Islam convinced Baring and the British that it would be dangerous for Britain to withdraw, it became a further justification for their continuing presence. 

Egyptian control over Sudan faltered in the 1870s. In 1873 Khedive Ismail had appointed General Gordon as governor general of Sudan. He put down a series of revolts against the khedive and taken action to supress the slave trade. He resigned and returned to England when Ismail was deposed and his succesors failed to maintain order or prevent the slave trade.

As Egyptian control further weakened, Sudan complicated more in 1881 by the appearance of the radical jihadist leader, the mahdi, intent on driving out Eypt. 

Mahdist forces had victories- but the wiping out of all but 300 of 7,000 troops under William Hicks in Nov 1883 convinced London that Egypt no longer had control over Sudan. 

Sudan itself was of little interest to Britain. However, London had no intention of allowing similar forces to take control of Cairo and Alexandria, which mattered to British interest. 

As they had no confidence in the khedive, the chances of British withdrawal from Egypt were reduced by the emergence of the mahdi. 

15 of 24

The collapse of Liberalism in Britain

  • Gladstone's committment to Home Rule in Ireland resulted in the splitting of the Liberal Party and the dominance of the Conservatives. Their leader, Lord Salisbury, began his premiership frustrated by British presence in Egypt.
  • However, he was not prepared to give the French any potential strategic advantage in North Africa by withdrawal from Egypt and was aware of the mahdi's patriotic sentiments.
  • Salisbury was prepared to sacrifice building projects in Egypt in the interests of withdrawal if he could protect British interests.

Between 1887 and 1889 Salisbury worked with Turkey, France and Germany to hamemr out an agreement by which the British could re-enter Egypt.

Agreement for withdrawal was reached in Constantinople on 22 May 1887 with the Constantinople Convention, only to be blown out the water by the French and Russians who threatened the sultan with the invasion of Syria and America if the British were granted ongoing entry rights. 

Salisbury drew the conclusion that the French remained the greatest threat to the Empire. He concluded that Britain's strategic interests could only be guaranteed by maintaining Britain's presence in Egypt. 

16 of 24

Gladstone's concerns + policy

Gladstone and Baring feared that the problems of the Sudan would destabilise their programme of financial consolidation in Egypt and they judged the Egyptians to be unable to rule the Sudan effectively.

They were prepared to cut Sudan loose in the interests of maintaining stability and control in Egypt. 

The British came to the conclusion that evacuation of Egyptian garrisons in the Sudan was necessary. 

Gladstone could see no reason for Britain to be drawn into the problems of the Sudan. 

Britain had no strategic or economic interests in the area.

In 1884, General Gordon, who had governed Sudan in the 1870s was dispatched to the Sudan to organise the evacuation. 

17 of 24

General Gordon's mission in Sudan

  • Major General Charles Gordon was a notable example of the kind of imperialist that existed on the edge of the empire. 
  • He spent most of his time on the fringe of the empire in China and Sudan. He mapped the Nile as far as Uganda and was hugely energetic in efforts to end the slave trade in the 1870s. 
  • 1884-85: His dispatches and extracts from his time in Khartoum in many ways suggests that his intention was to try and generate enough publicity to change government policy but also- the orders themselves were impossible to carry out without adequate reinforcements, which Baring refused. 
  • Instead of withdrawing the garrison, he spent time in the city writing plans for handing over authority to an anti-mahdist popular figure and asking for more troops.
  • When the mahdi approached, Gordon refused to leave- more evacuations. 
18 of 24

General Gordon's mission in Sudan

The Siege of Khartoum:

  • Relief operation arrived two days too late to rescue Gordon. 
  • The mahdi broke through the fortifications at Khartoum on 26 January 1885 and the entire garrison was killed- Gordon himself was decapitated.
  • The public blamed Gladstone for taking too long to prepare relief and titled him Murderer of Gordon.
  • Cabinet was deeply divided- Sudan to be left to the mahdi.

Long term: the desire to avenge Gordon made a deep impact. Kitchener was sent to quell the mahdi in the 1890s.

Reconquest of Sudan 1896^

19 of 24

The conquest of the Sudan 1898

  • In 1896, Lord Salisbury ordered a campaign in Sudan to secure the source of the Nile. The campaign, led by Kitchener, was to result in the annexation of Sudan snd the crushing of mahdist forces. 
  • In the early 1880s, the partition of Africa had not yet taken place and British interests were served best by the occupation of Egypt only.

1890s: in order to protect British interests in Egypt, it was necessary to control the source of the Nile. Policy was dictated by two threats...

  • Centuries old Anglo-French rivalry- Nile control
  • Fears of new mahdist forces and Islamic nationalism

In 1896, an expedition was launched under Lord Kitchener to address the threats. The defeat of the Italians by mahdist forces at the Battle of Adowa in 1896 convinced Salisbury that the time was now to show force to the jihadists. 

Its scope and nature were cautious and the British objective was initially Dongola (between Egypt and Khartoum). The expedition was to proceed with care, ensuring supply lines remained intact. It was to culminate in the conquest of the Sudan and the defeat of the mahdi at Omdurman. 

20 of 24

The fear of French occupation

  • In 1890 Britain declared that the whole of the Nile Valley was its 'sphere of influence'
  • London was successful in its diplomatic efforts with Italy, Germany and Belgium, not France.
  • In 1894 Sir Edward Grey told the Commons that French interference in the Nile Valley would be intepreted by the British as an unfriendly act. 
  • It became clear to Salisbury that at some point Britain's interests must move forward from declaring a sphere of influence to a more visible presence in the Sudan. This would thwart French expansion and protect water that irrigates cotton fields in Egypt, securing stability there.

Ultimate French ambition: link western colonies with Dijibouti- Blue Nile.                                  Ultimate British interest: the reverse (South Africa + British East Africa)- White Nile

21 of 24

Fashoda 1898

  • In 1898 two armed forces met at Fashoda, at almost the exact point at which British and French interests intersected.
  • Tiny French force of 120 reached Fashoda from Brazzaville when Kitchener's 1,500 force as well as 5 gun boats arrived fresh from victory over the mahdi at Omdurman.
  • Kitchener allowed the French flag to fly - aided by the overwhelming British force.
  • Marchand's restraint also allowed this- both sides then agreed to refer the matter to London and Paris and so, a party took place. 
  • French government saw Britain's naval superiority and prepared to back down. 
  • On the 3 November, France dropped their claim to Fashoda. 
22 of 24

The role of General Horatio Herbert Kitchener

  • Kitchener was pure army and his personality exhibited the self-control that Gordon lacked. 
  • Had an early career in the Middle East and Mediterranean- part of failed Gordon relief.

Kitchener's campaigns in the Sudan were methodical, equipped with modern weaponry, supported by light-gauge railways and gunboats. His initial objective was Dongola but the positive reports of the expedition and wiping out of the mahdists at Ferkeh in 1896 meant that Salisbury was happy to extend the objective to the whole of Sudan.

The campaign was successful and Kitchener won a further victory against the mahdi at Atbara, then Omdurman where his forces destroyed the mahdi's.

  • When Khartoum was retaken, Kitchener's actions demonstrated his deep hatred of the mahdi and veneration of Gordon. 
  • He ordered the decapitated mahdi's tomb to be open to stop it becoming a pilgrimage. 
  • Baring had to intervene to ensure the mahdi's head was buried and treated decently.

Kitchener's actions in the Sudan and his later use of concentration camps in the Boer War outraged anti-imperialists in Britain but he was hugely popular with the public. 

23 of 24

The significance of Omdurman 1898

Salisbury had always held the destruction of the mahdi to be a desirable long term goal- 'our desire to extirpate from the earth one of the vilest despotisms ever seen'

Kitchener's careful advance and the advantage of the new British weapon, Maxim gun, meant that this objective was achieved at the Battle of Omdurman.

  • Mahdist forces c. 10,000 dead, 13,000 prisoner, 5,000 wounded
  • British forces 47 dead, 382 wounded 

The behaviour of the British towards the French at Fashoda and towards the mahdi at Omdurman could hardly stand in starker contrast. 

The BrItish had effective control of the whole of the Nile Valley and Sudan became apart of the British Empire, although the fiction that Sudan was ruled by Egypt was maintained during the veiled protectorate. 

24 of 24

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar History resources:

See all History resources »See all The British Empire and the fall of colonialism resources »