'Velsalius is more important than Harvey in the History of Medicine' How far do you agree with this statement. (8)
I agree with this statement to an extent. Vesalius was important in the history of medicine bacause he proved Galen wrong in his work on anatomy. He did this by dissecting humans, observing what he saw, making detailed diagrams and publishing his work in a book. This meant that for the first time the work of ancient doctors, like Galen, was proved wrong and the Church had to accept that their ideas may not be correct.
Harvey was important because he proved that the heart was a pump. He did this by experimenting on people, making careful drawings and teaching other doctors about his findings. When people knew that the heart was a pump they finally had to agree that the theory of the four humours could not work because blood was not made but pumped around the body and so there could not be too much blood.
It is difficult to say which is more important in the history of medicine. At the time,both Vesalius and Harvey made little impact on the day-to-day treatments of illness and it took time for their ideas to be accepted. In the long term, I think that it was Vesalius who is more important because he got people thinking that the Ancient ideas were not always correct by proving Galen wrong. Harvey built on this by experimenting.
Comments
No comments have yet been made