Concept of anxiety is closely linked to arousal. Arousal can either be low or high and in terms of sport, high arousal is desired. Arousal can either be negative or positive on performance but depends on how athlete percieves their arousal.
Jones and Swain (1992) state that most elite athletes percieve their pre competition arousal as positive alertness rather than anxiety. Novice or less experienced athletes have negative response to rise in arousal.
Inverted U Theory
Yearkes and Dodson (1908), predicts relationship between arousal and performance as inverted- U shape. Optimum arousal depends on; type of activity, skill level of performer, and personality of the performer.
Drive Theory
Zajonc (1965), oversimplisitic and fails to appreciate the different personalities of the performer and the context of the performance. It only applies to gross sklils such as sprinting. Also applies to a dominant response so a well-learnt skill will be reproduced with high arousal. Athlete that is highly aroused must focus of producing the desired response.
Comments
No comments have yet been made