MB1 - Personality Expand Cards
0.0 / 5
- Created by: Psych951
- Created on: 11-05-18 15:50
What is Personality?
- Definitions
- Organisation
- Scientific usefulness
1 of 24
What is Personality Expanded
- Individual, distinctive, relatively enduring ways of behaving. – Patterns of behaviour and thought responses
- Dynamic organisation of psychophysical systems – Primarily internal
- Scientific usefulness: Comprehensive, factual framework; Predictive power; Stimulate new knowledge.
2 of 24
Psychodynamic Perspective
- Psychoanalytic theory
- Personality as an energy system
- Structures of personality
- Anxiety
- Defence mechanisms
- Examples of defence mechanisms
3 of 24
Psychodynamic Perspective Expanded
- Psychoanalytic theory = Using dream interpretation and free association to explore unconscious drives
- Personality is an energy system = Instincts generate psychic energy (libido) that drives behaviour due to need for release of energy.
- Structures of personality:
- Id = Core, psychic energy, unconscious, pleasure principle
- Ego = Executive (balances id and superego), conscious, reality principle.
- Superego = Ideal self, control impulses, morality principle.
- Anxiety caused by ego managing impulses that threaten to get out of control – Dealt with through rational or irrational coping methods
- Defence mechanisms = unconscious mental operations that minimise anxiety by distorting reality to release impulses.
- Defence mechanisms Inc. repression (prevent negative feelings reaching conscious), denial, displacement, intellectualisation, projection, rationalisation, reaction formalisation and sublimation
4 of 24
Psychosexual Personality Development
- Development
- Fixation
- Regression
- Stages
- How personality develops (process)
5 of 24
Psychosexual Personality Development Expanded
- Development in which id’s pleasure seeking is focussed on specific pleasure-sensitive areas
- Fixation = Arrested development with instincts focussed on a particular theme due to too much or little stimulation. = Libido has been permanently invested in stage
- Regression = Psychological retreat to earlier stage due to current conflict
- Stages:
- Oral = infancy, mouth, self-indulgence or dependence
- Anal = 2-3, elimination, compulsion or messiness
- Phallic = 4-5, sexual organs, Oedipus/Electra, identification
- Latency = 6-12, dormant sexual desire
- Genital = 12+, normal sexuality.
- Process:
- Stages are associated with particular conflict that must be resolved before the moving to next stage
- Resolution of conflicts requires expenditure of sexual energy and the more energy that is expended at a particular stage, the more the important characteristics of that stage remain with the individual as he/she matures psychologically.
- The variety of characteristic e.g. organised or disorganised depends on whether stimulation was high or low.
6 of 24
Neoanalytic Approach
- Disagree with Freud
- Adler
- Object relations theory
- Jung and the unconscious
- Archetypes
- Evaluation of psychodynamic
7 of 24
Neoanalytic Approach Expanded
- Disagree with certain aspects of Freud’s approach. – Too much emphasis on sexuality
- Adler = Humans driven by social interest not selfish urges
- Object relations theory = Mental representations of self and others that may be realistic or distorted due to early caregiver experiences (replaced by Bawlby’s theories)
- Jung = Personal unconscious = Driven by individual experience - Collective unconscious = Consists of memories accumulated throughout history from entire human race - These types of unconscious drive personality development, not Freud's
- Archetypes = Inherited tendencies to interpret experiences in certain ways
- Evaluation of psychodynamic:
- Lack of empirical support and rigorous testing
- Supported by cognitive evidence of unconscious
- Rich detail
- Not falsifiable
- Cultural and gender bias
- Correct about importance of childhood experiences but over emphasises sexuality
8 of 24
Humanist Perspective Expanded
- Phenomenology
- Kelly's personal constructs theory
- Roger's theory of self
- Congruency
- Developing self-esteem and self-concept
- Evaluation of Humanist approach
9 of 24
Humanist Perspective Expanded
- Phenomonology - Focus on the presence, direct experience and individuals - Positive view of individual potential
- Kelly’s personal construct theory = Goal to find personal meaning
- Personal constructs = Cognitive categories to organise info about reality according to what they perceive to be important – Habitual categorisation tendencies.
- Roger’s theory of self = Natural forces direct us to self-actualisation – Organised, consistent perceptions about oneself
- Desire for self-consistency/congruence = when inconsistent, anxiety develops so either alter self-concept or distort reality.
- Self-esteem/self-concept development and maintenance - Need for positive self-regard – Conditions of worth cause incongruence – Self-verification and self-enhancement
- Evaluation:
- Relies on self-report
- Tested and measured
- Self-actualisation is hard to define and measure
- Positive psychology movement.
10 of 24
Trait Perspective
- Type theories vs. Trait theories
- Personality traits
- Lexical approach vs. Factor analysis
- Disagreements
- Eysenck's super traits
- Five-factor model
- Stable personality
- Evaluation
11 of 24
Trait Perspective Expanded
- Type theories categorise people into groups who share common personalities whereas trait theories define personality by degree to which have certain traits.
- Personality traits = Relatively stable characteristics that establish individual identity
- Identifying traits: Lexical approach = basis of everyday language or factor analysis = identify clusters of behaviour that correlate.
- Disagreement on how many traits e.g. Catell’s 16 vs. Eysenck’s 2
- Eysenck’s super traits: Extraversion and neuroticism.
- Five factor model = Openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism (OCEAN) – Predict behaviour based on these traits – Measured by NEOP-PI – May be universal
- Basis of personality theories is that it is stable, but responses change over time. – Some dimensions more stable than others – Propose average level of traits that fluctuate depending on situations.
- Evaluation:
- Value of identifying, classifying and measuring stable traits = Precise
- Lack of focus on interaction of traits
- Description not explanation.
12 of 24
Biological Perspective 1
- Genetics
- Comprehensive twin study
- Individual differences in brain functioning
- Eysenck's model
- Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory
13 of 24
Biological Perspective 1 Expanded
- Genetics = Higher concordance between MZ twins on many psych characteristics – No individual gene for traits but interaction between many genes.
- Study looking at MZ and DZ reared together and apart found high cause of variation by genetic and personal experience but little for shared environments
- Individual differences in brain functioning affect personality – Eysenck’s and temperament.
- Eysenck’s model: Own average level of arousal in brain (chemical and neural activity) and personality reflects attempt to achieve optimal arousal - Extroverts low arousal, introverts high, Neurotics have sudden and large shifts, stable have predictable, slower, small shifts.
- Supported by MZ similarity on super traits and brain region correlates
- Environment effects personality too but biological basis of responses to experiences.
- Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity theory = Same spectrum of personality as Eysenck but due to sensitivity of biological systems to reward and inhibition/punishment determined by basic biological factors not arousal.
14 of 24
Biological Perspective 2
- Temperament
- Evaluation
15 of 24
Biological Perspective 2 Expanded
- Temperament = Individual differences in responses from early life that influence personality – Biological differences e.g. inhibited people have higher physiological arousal, stress hormone secretion and amygdala activity. – Not destiny, affected by environment e.g. certain temperaments may only arise in or be strengthened by certain situations.
- Evaluation: Cutting edge approach; Sophisticated technology; Rigorous and credible; Early stages e.g. how does early biological origins interact with situational factors.
16 of 24
Social-Cognitive Perspective 1 Expanded
- Approach
- Reciprocal determinism
- Rotter's likelihood of behaviour
- Locus of control
- Self-efficacy
17 of 24
Social-Cognitive Perspective 1 Expanded
- Combined cognitive and behaviourist = interaction of thinking with social environment to produce learning experiences/behaviour.
- Reciprocal determinism = Person (personality, cognitive processes), environment (stimuli, reinforcement) and behaviour (type, frequency, intensity) all influence on another in a pattern of two-way causal links.
- Rotter: Likelihood of behaviour in situation determined by expectancy and reinforcement value – Conditioning within cognitive framework – Expectancy concepts affect personality
- Locus of control = degree of personal control – I-E scale measures LoC – Internal locus of control are more self-determined, successful, resistant to social influence etc
- Self-efficacy = belief about ability to perform behaviours needed to reach valued outcomes
- Determined by previous performance expectancies, observational learning, verbal persuasion and emotional arousal
- Strong predictor of future performance
18 of 24
Social-Cognitive Perspective 2
- What is CAPS?
- The variables
- Explaining the stable personality/changing behaviour paradox
- Behavioural signatures
- Evaluation of the social-cognitive perspective
19 of 24
Social-Cognitive Perspective 2 Expanded
- Mischel and Shoda’s cognitive-affective personality system (CAPS) = Organised system of 5 variables that interact with each other and environment to produce distinctive patterns of behaviour that create personality
- 5 variables = Encoding (personal constructs), beliefs and expectancies, goals and values, affects (emotions) and competencies and self-regulation.
- Explains paradox between personality consistency and behavioural inconsistency – Behaviour depends on situation and how situation relates to CAPS i.e. how it is encoded, what goals are involved etc. which creates distinct behavioural signatures
- Behavioural signatures are consistent responses in certain situations - representations of personality – Personality coherence from signatures rather than each individual behaviour/over-all average behaviour
- Evaluation:
- Scientific
- Incorporates best of cognitive and behavioural
- Measured and researched with precision
- Resolve issue of personality consistency
- Need to advance models and understand circumstances that they work in.
20 of 24
Culture, Gender and Personality
- Cultural differences affect personality
- Gender schemas
- Limitations
21 of 24
Culture, Gender and Personality Expanded
- Cultural differences affect personality
- Complexity and Interdependence (collectivist) of cultures affect diversity and conflict between values
- Individualistic = personal traits better predictors of behaviour and opposite for collectivist
- Gender role socialisation produces schemas of gender roles that affect personality – Gender schemas differ between cultures.
- Limitation = Can’t explain all cultural differences as only 40% embrace individualistic vs collectivist – Findings aren’t robust
22 of 24
Assessment of Personality
- Requirements when measuring personality
- Interviews
- Behavioural assessment
- Remote bhevaiour sampling
- Personality scales
- Projective tests
- Rosarch test
- Thematic apperception test
23 of 24
Assessment of Personality Expanded
- Measuring personality – Needs to be reliable and valid, able to predict
- Interviews = Structured so measuring same thing between participants – General appearance, voice patterns, facial expressions etc. should be looked at too
- Interviewer may affect responses and depends on interview honesty.
- Behavioural assessment = Explicit coding of behavioural categories
- Trained observers for high reliability
- Can measure behavioural signatures
- Requires precision.
- Remote behaviour sampling = Self-reported behaviour and feelings in random daily lives
- Behaviour across many different situations collected quickly
- Personality scales = Objective measures with standard questions –
- Easy scoring and comparison
- Issue of individuals false responding
- Rational theoretical approach = items based on theorist’s conception of trait.
- Projective tests = Ambiguous stimuli and ask for interpretation – Project inner feelings and perceptions
- Rorschach test = 10 inkblots and analyse what responses may symbolise
- Thematic apperception test = Write story based on pictures then analyse themes.
24 of 24
Similar Psychology resources:
5.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
Comments
No comments have yet been made