History - The Reform of Parliament (Theme 1)
4.0 / 5 based on 2 ratings
- Created by: LeksiCameron
- Created on: 21-11-17 15:34
Who Could Vote in 1780?
- Out of a population of 10 million in England, Scotland & Wales, less than half a million (5%) could vote
- In the counties (rural areas), only those with freehold property worth 40 shillings a year could vote
- In the boroughs, a wide range of qualifications applied, but usually one had to own proporty or pay local taxes or rates
- The system dates back to medieval times. Therefore, many new industrial cities such as Manchester and Leeds did not have their own MP
1 of 23
Who Could Vote by 1928?
- By 1928 all men and women aged 21 and over had the right to vote
- Thew only significant difference between the franchise in 1928 and the franchise today is that the voting age was further reduced to age 18 in 1969
- By 1928 Britian was therefore far more democratic than it had been in 1780
2 of 23
Major Changes to the Franchise
- The 1832 Reform Act extended the franchise so that 1 in 5 adult males (20%) could vote
- The 1867 Reform Act extended the franchise so that 1 in 3 adult males (33%) could vote
- The 1884 Reform Act extended the franchise so that 3 in 5 adult males (60%) could vote
- The 1918 Reform Act gave the vote to all men over the age of 21 and to women over the age of 30 if they were a householders or married to one
- The 1928 Reform Act (Equal Franchise Act) gave women the vote on the same terms as men
3 of 23
Changes in Political Parties
- During 1780-1832 Paliament was dominated by two parties with strong landowning interests, namely the Tories and the Whigs
- During 1832-67 the Tories evolved into the Conservatives and the Whigs into the Liberals, largely due to the extended franchise
- After 1867 political parties had to take more account of working-class opinion and reporting in the press
- The 'Labour Party' emerged during the 1880s and 1890s, existing formally as a professional party from 1906
4 of 23
Franchise Statistics
- 1780 - c. 490,000 men / 11% of men / 0% of women / 5% overall could vote
- 1832 - c. 800,000 men / 20% of men / 0% of women
- 1867 - 2 million men / 33% of men / 0% of women
- 1884 - 5 million men / 50% of men / 0% of women
- 1918 - 13 million men / 100% of men / 8.5 million women / 60% of women
- 1928 - 14.5 million men / 100% of men / 14.5 million women / 100%
5 of 23
Causes of Parliamentary Reform, 1780-1832
- Reform leaugues and Reform Unions
- Party interests within Parliament
- Political leadership in and out of Parliament
- Specific circumstances (e.g. impact of revolutions, wars)
- Expansion of education and literacy
- Growth of a radical and popular press
- Influence of radical intellectuals
- Extra-parliamentary agitation
6 of 23
Events during the time of Reforms in Britian
Radical reforms, 1790-1819
Unrest of 1830-31
- 1832 Reform Act
Chartist movement, Newport Rising
- 1867 Reform Act
Emergence of British socialism
- 1884-5 Reform Act
- 1918 Reform Act
- 1928 Reform Act
7 of 23
International Wars during time of Reform in Britia
- 1775-83: War of American Independence
- 1792-1802: French Revolutionary Wars
- 1803-15: Napoleonic Wars
- 1808-33: Spanish American Wars of Independence
- 1821-32: Greek War of Independence
- 1839-42: First Opium War (Britain/China)
- 1853-6: Crimean War
- 1856-60: Second Opium War (Britian/China)
- 1861-5: American Civil War
- 1870-1: Franco-Prussian War
- 1877-8: Russo-Turkish War
- 1879: Anglo-Zulu War
- 1899-1902: Second Boer War
- 1912-13: Balkan Wars
- 1914-18: First World War
8 of 23
International Revolutions during the time of Refor
- 1765-83: American Revolution
- 1789-99: French Revolution
- 1821: Greek Revolution
- 1830: July Revolution (France)
- Belgian Revolution
- Polish Revolution
- 1848 year of revolutions
- French (successful)
- German states (defeated)
- Italian states (defeated)
- 1857: Indian rebellion v. Britain
- 1870-1: Italian/German unification
- 1905: Russian Revolution
- 1911-12: Chinese Revolution
- 1917: Russian Revolutions
9 of 23
Rotten & Pocket Boroughs
- Before the 1832 Reform Act, the system of representation had changed little since medieval times, despite population growth
- Many boroughs (urban areas) that had thrived in the Middle Ages had since declined but still elected MPs
- The most notorious was Old Sarum, which had only seven voters!
- Over 50 seats had fewer than 50 voters each. These were the so-called ‘rotten boroughs’
- By contrast, many modern industrial cites like Manchester & Leeds did not have an MP
- Many small boroughs were dominated by local landlords or businessmen and were known as ‘pocket boroughs’ – votes & even whole seats were bought & sold!
- More than half of seats were uncontested
10 of 23
Reforming the System
- In 1785 William Pitt the Younger proposed to disenfranchise 36 of the worst rotten boroughs and redistribute their 72 seats to London & the most populous counties, but his bill failed to secure majority support in Parliament
- The 1832 Reform Act abolished both MPs in 56 rotten and pocket boroughs, whilst 30 boroughs lost one MP. Twenty-two new boroughs with two MPs were created, including Manchester, Leeds and Bolton
- However, about 70 pocket boroughs remained
- The 1867 Reform Act deprived 38 small boroughs of one MP and 4 other boroughs lost both MPs because of corruption. Nineteen seats were given to the larger boroughs and 26 to the counties
- The Redistribution Act of 1885 saw all boroughs with fewer than 15,000 votes lose both of their seats, whilst those with fewer than 50,000 lost one seat
11 of 23
Fancy Franchises & Plural Voting
- During the 1700s and 1800s most members of the upper & middle classes thought that democracy was dangerous & would lead to mob rule
- One way of avoiding this was to give more votes to those deemed to be intellectually or morally superior!
- In 1867 an attempt was made by Disraeli to introduce ‘fancy franchises’ – an extra vote would go to those with professional qualifications or a university degree. This failed, however
- Even after the 1884 Reform Act, 7% of the population had more than one vote – e.g. graduates of Oxford, Cambridge and London (the elite universities)
- Plural voting was not completely abolished until 194
12 of 23
Redistribution Acts
- As politics became more professional during the 19th century, the emphasis changed from avoiding democracy to ensuring that the electoral system worked in favour of one’s own party
- The Conservatives & Liberals knew where their core support lay and tried to ensure that constituency boundaries were set to maximise their support
- The 1832 Reform Act enfranchised many business owners & shopkeepers in cities like Leeds & Manchester; in general these were more likely to vote Whig than Tory
- The redistribution of seats in 1867 favoured the Tories by giving more seats to the Tory-dominated counties
- The Redistribution Act of 1885 created many suburban constituencies out of the larger towns and cities. These were more likely to vote Conservative and still do today!
13 of 23
Electoral Practices & Expenses
- At a time of growing democratisation the wealthier members of society had two further ways of holding onto power, namely by intimidation or corruption
- Until 1872, elections were carried out openly by raising of hands, which enabled landlords & employers to put pressure on their tenants & employees
- This was ended by the Ballot Act of 1872, which was passed by Gladstone’s Liberal government
- The wealthy were also able to spend more on campaigning & bribery than poorer candidates. The Corrupt & Illegal Practices Prevention Act of 1883 set maximum limits for expenditure on elections
14 of 23
Changes to the Electoral and Representative System
Special Franchises
- Disraeli tried to create 'fancy franchises' in 1867 but did not succeed
- The aim of fancy franchises had been to give more votes to the educated
- After the 1884 Reform Act, 7% of the population still had more than one vote
- These went to graduates of Oxbridge & London; also occupational voting
Voting
- In rotten & pocket boroughs, local landowners often controlled the seat
- Secret ballot only introduced with the Ballot Act of 1872
- In 30 years after 1832, still only about 50% of seats were contested
- Before 1832 seats were oten bought 7 sold & only 30% were contested
15 of 23
Changes to the Electoral and Representative System
Election Campaigns:
- Before 1832 around 25% of electors came under landlord influence
- Electors were often bribed or plied with food and drink; even kidnapped
- The Corruption and Illegal Practices Prevention Act was introduced in 1883
- Each candidate had one paid election agent who had to provide accounts
Constituencies:
- Many industrial towns & cities gained seats in 1832; more suburban seats from 1885
- Before 1832, 50 seats had fewer than 50 voters each - rotten boroughs
- 1832 Reform Act abolished 145 rotten & pocket borough seats, but 70 pocket boroughs remained
- In 1885 all boroughs with fewer than 15,000 voters lost both seats
16 of 23
Who was still excluded from the franchise by 1884?
- The 1867 Reform Act had enfranchised male borough residents owning or occupying houses if they had been resident for a year or longer, and male county residents leasing land worth £5 a year, or with property of a rateable value of £12 per year
- This had effectively given the vote to the 'respectable' working class in boroughs & to rural farmers
- However, in addition to all women, agricultural labourers in the countryside and casual or transient workers in the towns & cities were still excluded
17 of 23
The Motives for Further Reform
- The 1867 Reform Act had created an uneven situation, giving the vote to all householders in the boroughs but not in the counties: a glaring anomaly
- Gladstone & the Liberals were in power & believed that (a) this ineuqality had to be rectified & (b) that enfranchising rural miners & agricultural labourers would benefit their party
- There was relatively little external pressure on this occasion; the reform was backed by the Conservatives on the grounds that there would also be a Redistribution Act
18 of 23
The 1884 Reform Act
- The franchise was extended to all householders in the countryside who had been resident for a year as well as to £10 lodgers: same as in boroughs
- 2.5 million new voters (mainly rural) were added; 60% of the adult male population could now vote
- However, plural voting still took place. Graduates of Oxbridge & London & Professionals with property in boroughs where they did not lice had more than one vote - 7% of the electorate were still plural voters
19 of 23
Consequences of the 1832 and 1867 Reform Acts
Changes in the Franchise overall:
- 1832 - Increased from 11% of men to 20% of men
- 1867 - Increased from 20% of men to 33% of men
Changes to borough Franchise:
- 1832 - 145 borough seats abolished; universal £10 qualification
- 1867 - One -year residency qualification & £10 lodgers enfranchised; compounders included
Impact on Parties:
- 1832 - Whigs-Liberals dominate 1832-1874
- 1867 - Conservatives lose in 1868 but win in 1874
Change to county Franchise:
- 1832 - Chandos Amendement adds £50 farmers to 40-shilling freeholders
- 1867 - £5 leaseholders and those with property rateable value of £12 enfranchised
20 of 23
The Redistribution Act of 1885
- The Conservatives under Lord Salisbury were concerned about a further extension of the franchise & the Tory-dominated House of Lords rejected the Liberal Electoral Bill early in 1884
- The Bill was passed later in the same year, however, because Lord Salisbury gave his backing to the Reform Bill once had also secured a Redistribution Bill
- The Redistribution Act, Passed in 1885, carved a large number of suburban constituencies out of large urban areas; London increased from 22 seats to 62
21 of 23
Who was still excluded from the franchise
- The Reform Acts of 1832, 1867 and 1884 had not brought about a democracy within Great Britain
- Before the Reform Act of February 1918, about 40% of men and all women were excluded from the franchise
- The men excluded were mainly working class, including those who did not have a one-year residence qualification, sons living with parents, and servants living with their employers
- Women had been excluded for mainly prejudicial reasons related to perceived gender differences in character & roles
22 of 23
The Impact of World War One
- World War One changed attitudes towards women & working class men, making arguments in favour of excluding them from the franchise seem petty
- Women contributed massively to the war effort, especially in the munitions industry, a process hastened with the introduction of military conscription in 1916 which took more men to the front
- By the end of the war, 60% of those working in shell factories were women
- Lloyd George, PM from December 1916, was one of many who were now in favour of votes for women & for all men
23 of 23
Similar History resources:
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
4.5 / 5 based on 2 ratings
Comments
No comments have yet been made