Education Sociologists

?
  • Created by: 11JimDan
  • Created on: 09-01-17 20:56

Overview of Functionalism and Education

  • Consensus Approach - It is possible for everybody to get along
  • Stucturalist - Institutions will influence individuals' behaviour
  • Education should provide socialisation; teach skills needed for work; and perform role allocation.

CRITCISMS

  • Only focuses on the positives of education and ignores the negative. (e.g. exams can create stress).
  • Difficult to get a value consensus in a multicultural society.
  • Deterministic - Not all students will follow what they have been taught.
  • Rich, white female students have advantages.
  • Many argue that schools do not provide skills needed for work.
1 of 10

Parsons (Functionalism)

  • Education is a bridge between home and work - Prepares you for the next step.
  • AGIL System - what society needs to be successful
  • ↪ Adaptation - Can societies change to meet the needs of the people?
  • ↪ Goal attainment - Can you meet goals you have set for yourself?
  • ↪ Integration - How does society work together?
  • ↪ Latency - Can we keep improving?
  • Meritocracy - Hard work is rewarded

Criticisms

  • Not all hard work is rewarded
  • Deterministic
  • Some will not lose their family's views
  • Merton said that not every part of society is good and it is too complex which means it is impossible for schools to teach a value consensus. 
2 of 10

Durkheim (Functionalism)

  • History is important - Helps achieve social solidarity
  • School is like a miniture society - Follow rules; Independence; Value consenus
  • Division of labour - Individuals know what they are good at.
  • If school failed to do these things, there would be anomie (no normal).

Criticisms

  • Ineffective in teaching the same values.
  • Deterministic - can't change what happens to you↪ Assumed that everyone would end up the same way.
  • Unequal - Norms and values were not a true representation of everyone.
  • Armchair theorist - No research to back his views up
3 of 10

Davis and Moore (Functionalism)

  • Key purpose of education is role allocation - Most talented get higher qualifications which leads to important jobs with high rewards/money.
  • Inequality is necessary

Criticisms

  • The education system does not always sort us well.
4 of 10

Schultz (Functionalism)

  • We should spend money on improving education - End up with more qualified people that will be able to contribute more to the economy.
  • We need to compete globally. 

Criticisms

  • School cannot single-handedly teach values - Influences from family and media.
  • Britain is 26th on the PISA scale, even though we invest a lot of money in education.
5 of 10

Overview of Marxism and Education

  • Conflict theory - Society is in a state of conflict due to competition for limited resources (e.g. bourgeosie vs proletariat).
  • Structural theory - Theory that institutions control an individual's behaviour.
  • Education system reproduces (fails the working class each generation) and legitimises (makes people accept their inferior place in society as it is inevitable) class inequality.

Criticisms

  • Reductionist - only focuses on class.
  • Ignores the positives of education.
  • Not every school operates the same way.
  • Some courses require critical thinking.
  • Most of the studies are outdated - Postmodernists suggest that a new type of flexible workforce is required. 
  • Does not take gender or ethnic inequalities into account. 
6 of 10

Althusser (Marxism)

  • Ideological State Apparatus (ISA) - Control of ideas, beliefs and values.
  • Repressive State Apparatus (RSA) - Physical force to keep society the way you want it (e.g. police)
  • Society needs both of these, and they are both used to support capitalism. - Schools promote capitalism.
  • If you work hard, you will get a good job that pays well.
  • School prepares students to accept their future exploitation. 
  • When you start working, you'll be working under a boss from a big company - Schools teach that managers have earned their ability to have power over others.
  • Hidden curriculum promotes hegemony (When a culturally diverse society is dominated by ruling class values and ideas)

Criticisms

  • Armchair theorist - He did no research to back up his views.
  • Not everything in the hidden curriculum teaches hegemony - Teaching to share and look out for one another.
7 of 10

Bowles and Gintis (Marxism)

  • Studied 227 schools in New York - Representative.
  • Schools reward obedience - Not rewarding creativity or independence.
  • Correspondence principle - School is like work↪ Attendence & punctuality, uniform, rules, deadlines, teachers are like bosses, tolerance, competition.
  • Myth of meritocracy - Hard work is not always rewarded↪ Sometimes, lazy people are rewarded.

Criticisms

  • Ethnocentric as it only focused on one area. 
  • Some teachers do reward independence.
  • School gives you more chances than work.
  • Some school staff care more about you as a person.
8 of 10

Bourdieu (Marxism)

  • Education system reproduces the capitalist system - The poor are materially deprived (e.g. can't afford textbooks or tutors).
  • Cultural deprivation - The rich have cultural capital (Ideas, habits and lifestyles of the rich).
  • Education system values hegemony.
  • Habitus - Certain habits of the rich and poor.

Criticisms

  • Deterministic - The rich will stay rich
  • Functionalists believe it is meritocracy. 
9 of 10

Willis (Marxism)

  • The Lads Study - Studied 12 working class 'lads'; Looked at their last 18 months of school and first few months of work; They chose to fail; they formed a group who refused to conform to the system (being immature, talking over others, retaliating to teachers).
  • Willis thought they exhibited this behaviour because of boredom - Called the behaviour 'having a laff'. 
  • Called the conforming students 'ear'oles'.
  • When the 'lads' started to work, they experienced 'shop floor culture' - This is the ability to mess around at work; School taught students to cope with the boredom.

Criticism

  • Weaknesses in methodology - Impractical, as it took a long time; androcentric, as it ignored women; unrepresentative, due to its small sample size.
  • A lack of manufacturing jobs in the UK means that they might not have been able to work today. 
10 of 10

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Sociology resources:

See all Sociology resources »See all Education resources »