Cognitive Approach
- Created by: I need no Username
- Created on: 24-06-20 04:04
Dual Processing Model
Dual processing model is a model of decision making that is comprised into two components,
System I : Intuitive thinking
- Uses heuristics
- Faster to use
- Everyday decision making
- Prone to error
Dual Processing Model
System II : Rational thinking
- Uses reason to think
- Slower process
- Requiring effort
- Utilises all information
- Less likely to bring certitude
- Abstract
Dual Processing Model Evaluation
Evaluation of the Dual Process Model
Limitations
- Overly reductionist
- Doesn't explain the interaction of the systems
- Doesn't account for the influence of emotion
- Not clearly defined (speed can't always discern between the two)
Strengths
- Biological evidence of use of different parts of the brain
- Supported by studies
Alter & Oppenheimer (2007) : Aim and Method
Alter & Oppenheimer (2007)
Aim : Find how fonts affect thinking
Method :
40 Princeton students
Cognitive Reflection Test (3 Questions)
Split randomly into two groups
Difficult font group
Easy font group
Alter & Oppenheimer (2007) Results and Conclusion
Results :
Simple font group : 10% all correct
Difficult font group : 65% all correct
Conclusion :
Difficult font made them slown down hence use System II
System II was more accurate hence more correct
Alter & Oppenheimer (2007) Evaluation
Sampling Bias : only 40 & a specific university in america
Same Size : only 40 - limits generalisability
Validity : 3 questions only impairs validity
Control Extraneous Variables : lab experiment
Reliability : easily replicated (lab experiment)
Confidentiality : mentioned school of participants
Descriptive Model
Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA)
Explains relationship between attitudes and behaviours in making choices
Main concept : behaviour is based on expected outcomes from that behaviour
Predictions create a predisposition (behaviour intention) determined by
Attitudes (if behaviour is positive or negative)
Subjective norms (perceived social pressure for situation)
Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB)
Extended from TRA to included perceived beahvior control. Perceived beahvior control is one's perceived ability to perform an action.
Accounts for situations where
Subjective norm permits
Attitude is positive
perceived inability to do beahviour
Descriptive Model Evaluations
Evaluation of TPB
Strengths
high predictive validity from resreach
Applicable
Quantifiable
Limitations
Doesn't account for moetion, intention & motivations
Doesn't consider environmental/economic factors
Assumes linear process
Doesn't account for change over time
Goodwin & Mullan : Aim and Method
Goodwin & Mullan
Aim :
Using TBA and past and pre0existing knowledge about a topic, to predict undergrad's intention to perform behaviour
Method :
72 undergrads
Read acdemic journal on glycaemic index
Did a questionare measuring predictor components of TBA
Goodwin and Mullan : Results and Conclusion
Results :
Subjective norms and attuities were best indicators
Pre-existing knowledge was a poor indicator
Past behavior had postive relationship with beahviour
Conclusion :
Interventions should focus on relationships of influence of target domgraphics to modiffy ingrained patterns of behaviour
Goodwin and Mullan Evaluation
Evaluation of Goodwin and Mullan
Reliability : replicable (lab experiment)
Generalisability : applicable to other situations
Control Extraneous Variable : lab experiment
Memory
Memory : the encoding, storage and retreival of information
Short Term :
30 seconds
Stores up to 7 'chunks' of informaiont
Long Term :
> 30 seconds
Theoretically infinite store
Encoding : the way in which memory is stored
Memory : Multi Store Memory
Multi Store Memory MSM
Modal assumes seperate stores and memory preocess is sequential and all memories stores in a uniform memory
Process :
1. info is regstered through senses
2. information is paid attention to *
3. information enters the short term memory
3. infromation is rehearsed and enter long term memory
4. after time information re-enters the sort term
5. rehearsal allows it to enter the long term again
*if not remembered will be forgotten
Glanzer & Cunitz (1966) : Aim & Method
Glanzer & Cunitz
Aim : test existance of serial positioning affect (primacy and recency effect)
Method :
240 Army men
2 groups
List of 20 common nouns, presented 1 at a time
Group 1 : write words immediately after list
Group 2 : write after a filler task counting backwards for 30 seconds
(filler task prevented rehearsal)
Glanzer & Cunitz (1966) : Results & Conclusion
Results :
Both groups were equal recal for beginning (primacy effect)
Group 2 was worse than group 1 at the end (recency affect)
Conclusions :
Primacy occurs as words are most rehearsed and transfer to LTM
Filler task prevented rehearsal
Lack of rehearsal didn't allow it to acces LTM
Glanzer & Cuntiz (1966) Evaluation
Sampling bias : gender bias & in army
Reliability : easily reliacated
Externatal Reliability : supported by various other studies
Low Ecological Validity : artifical task
Control Extraneous Variable : Lab experiment
Multi Store Memory Evaluation
Evalution of Multi Store Memory
Limitations
Simplitics, assumed linear process
Doesn't exaplin how memories occur without memories
DOesn't account for different types of memory (sematic, episodic, prodecural)
Foucs on structure to process
Strengths :
One of first models - inspired more theories
Forms of amnesia support segmented memory
Working Memory Model
Central Executive : control various systems, swaps between senses
Phonoligcal Loop (PL) : autority infromation, preserve order of infromation. Made of
Phonological Store (inner ear) : sounds
Articulatory Process (inner voice) : words maintanced through repetition
Viso-Spatial Store : visual and spacial memory
Episodic Buffer : added later, integrates infomation from central exectuive, PL and VVS to long term memory
Working Memory Model Evalution
Evalution of Working Memory Model
Strengths
Brain scans support differen regions for recalling different senses
More complex to MMS
Explain execution of everyday tasks
Limitations
Can only test one component at a time reducing validity
Doesn't account for LTM
Doesn't account for emotion or memory distortion
Landry & Bartling (2011) : Aim & Method
Landry & Bartling (2011)
Aim : Investigate if articultory supression influcens recall of written lists of phonologically dissimilar letters in serial recall
Method :
34 undergrad psych students
Experimental and control groups
Expeirmental : Recall words whilst saying 1 & 2 at a rate of two numbers per number (suppresion task)
Ten dissimilar sound letters in the list
Asked to recall as accurately as possible
Participants tested individually
Landry & Bartling (2011) : Results & Conclusion
Results
Control : 76% accurate recall
Experimental : 45% accurate recall
Conclusion
Supression task disrupted phonological loop - decreased accuracy
Overloading made it difficult to memorise comare to control
Landry & Bartley (2011) Evalution
Evaluation of Ladnry & Barley
Confirmation bias : proved hypothesis
Sampling bias : psych students
Low ecological validity : artifical task
Control extraneous variables : lab experience
Schema Theory : Terms
Key Terms
Accomodation : altering existing schemas to account for new into / developing new schemas
Assimilation : taking new infor nad incoperating it into existing schemas
Cognitive restructuing : used to adapt maladaptive pattersn of thinking by chaning schemas
Effort after Meaning : attempting to make unfmiliar ideas fit familiar frameworks
Storage : biological trace of encoded memory
Retrival : usage of stored info for problem solving, thinking & decision making
Idiosyncratic scripts : knoweldge specific to one's perosonal situation
Schema Theory
Schemas : mental representation derived from period experience/knowledge
Used to process/store information and influences behaviour
Allows to process things quickly (e.g. stereotyping)
Allows to predict future behaviour
New information is constantly added to schemas
Each person has their own schemas and there are multiple schemas
e.g. cultural, gender
Scripts : type of schema bout events being patterns of beahviour learned through interaction with the cnrionemnt.
e.g. Cultural scripts are all common to those in a cultural groups
Loftus & Palmer (1974)
Aim : investigate whether a leading question would affect an eyewitness's estimation of speed
Method :
150 students
Saw film of car accident from driving safetly
Randomly allocated group with the key work
hit
smashed
no question (control)
return a week later and rewatched the view
asked 'did you see any broken glass' (there was none)
Loftus & Palmer (1975) : Results and Conclusion
Results
Intesnse verb (smashed) more likely to report broken class to less intense group
Conclusion
The verb activates schemas associated to the work draw connotations
Schams incluenced the formation of the memory later
Loftus & Palmer (1975)
Evaluation of Loftus & Palmer
Sampling bias : students
Low ecological validity : video of crash not IRL
Reliability : replicable, lab experiment
Low concurrent validity : some studies conflict findings
Fredrick Barlett (1932)
Aim : investigate how the recollection of a story is affect by previous knowledge (cultural background, familiarity with a text)
Method :
British participants
Told Native American story including cultural details/names and unfamiliar structure
Two conditions
Repeated production
Repeat story after a short time
Repear again a period of weeks/days/months/years later
Serial production
Reprouduce the story shortly after hearing it to someone else
Fredrick Barlett (1932) : Results and Conclusion
Results :
No significant difference between two groups
Repeated production
Story shortened over time (180 words in 6-7 weeks)
Story became more conventional to fit social/cultural background
Conclusion :
Participants altered the story (asssmiliated) it to their schemas
Schemas seen to affect how infromation is recalled/remembered
Fredrick Bartlett (1932) Evaluation
Evaluation
Sampling bias : cultural bias - only British
Ecological validity : non-artifical task
Temporal Validity : longitunial study although old study
Validity : replicated
Correlational : can't deduce cause and affect relationship
Biases in Decision Making
Heuristics
Allow quick decisions
Function off presumption
intuitive judgement
Cognitive Biases
Due to use of heuristics
Errors in thinking affecting our decision making
Would have previoulsy held merit not so much now
Cognitive Biases I
Confirmation Bias : looking for information to confirm out beliefs
Ignoring information opposing out beliefs
Actively seeking information to confirm out beliefs
Interpreting evidence as supporting our beliefs
Illusory Correlations : tendency to incorreclty indentify relationships where none exists
Combated with rational thinking
Can result in stereotyping
Cognitive Biases II
Optimism Bias : belief that something good is more liekly to happen than fact attest
Results in poor decision making (rejecting reason)
Selective Attention : to focus on limited amount of information
Link to limited capacity of short term memory
Relate to requirement to pay attention to information
Impairs reason as can't account for information not known
Mendel et Al (2012) : Aim and Method
Aim : study whether psychiatrists and medical students are prone to confirmation bias
Method :
75 psychiastrist
75 medical students
Presented info on patient
Asked to make preliminary diagnosis of Alzheimers or depression
Actual diagnosis being depression
Givening prior information leading to Alzheimers
The participant than had a consultation with the client
Mendel et al (2011) : Results and Conclusion
Results :
Confirmation bias seen in : 13% psychiatrists & 25% students
asking questions to support their preliminary diagnosis
less likely to make correct dianogsises to balanced questions
Conclusion :
Psychiatrists and medical students are prone to confirmation bias
leads to incorrect diagnosis
Mendel et al (2011) Evaluation
High ecological validity ; non artifical task
Sampling bias : looked at two feild specifically
Generalisability : can be applied to other feilds / professions
Ethical implications : people will distrust professionals
Validity : still most got it correct
Snyder & Swann (1978) : Aim and Method
Aim : To how stereotying would affect questionaire and
Method :
Participants, female college students
Told they'd met either an introvert or extrovert
Asked to prepare a set of questions to ask the person they were to met
The actual person they met was randomly allocated (either true of false)
Snyder & Swann (1997) : Results and Conclusion
Results :
Participants asked questions confirming their perception of introverts and extroverts
e.g. expecting introvert "What do you dislike about parties?"
e.g. expecting extrovert "What do you do to liven up a party?"
Conclusion : questions confirmed stereotypes with personality types
Questions were designed so they would confirm the expectation
Snyder & Swann (1978) Evaluation
Evalution of Synder & Swamm
Sampling bias : gender bias
Low ecological validity : artifical task
Deception : told the person was introverted or extroverted
unclear if it was revealed to them later
Hamilton & Grifford (1976) : Aim and Method
Aim : investigate how expectations distort how information is processed
Method :
Participants read about two imaginary groups
Group A (Larger of 26)
Group B (Smaller of 13)
Readings have descriptions of individual group members
Descriptors were either helpful of harmful behaviour
Participants were asked to give impression of typical group member of each
Hamilton & Grifford (1976)
Results :
Participants consdiered behaviour of group B less desriable
No correlation between group membership and desirability
Hence illusory correlation
Conclusion :
Participants drew traits from inidival in a group and made the correlation to the whole group as having the same traits though these weren't representative of the group.
Demonstrating illusory correlation.
Reconstructive Memory
Reconstructive Memory
Recollection of memories after the event, and the notion that memores are malleable
Reliability : can be unreliable
Prone to manipulation
Changes over time
Affected by biases (schemas)
Manipulation of Memory : example of unreliability
Can come from leading questions
Loftus & Pickrell (1995) : Aim & Method I
Aim : to determine if false memories of autobigraphical event can be created through the power of suggestion
Method :
Participants 3 male & 21 female
Family members were contacted regarding participant
supplied three childhood memories
answered if they'd been lost in a mall
Data only used if particaipnt had never been lost in a mall
Loftus & Pickrell (1995) : Method & Results
Method II :
Particaipnts received questionair in the mall with
three genuine memories
false lost in mall memory
confidence of 1-10 scale or memories
it was outline if they didn't remember the memory to write "i did not remember this"
They were interviewed twice over four weeks told to recall as much as possible
After the expeirment they were debreifed of the false memory
Results :
25% participatants recalled a false memory
Low confidence and little wrote on false memory
Loftus & Pickrell (1995) : Conclusion & Evaluation
Conclusion :
Shows suggestion ability to create false memories
Indicate some are more susceptible to formation of false memories (only 25%)
Evaluation :
Sampling bias : gender bias - small sample
High ecological validity : non-artifical/typical task
Validity : not explanation to why such results
Ethics : deception
Extraneous variables : questionaire compeleted at home
Flashbulb Memories I
Flashbulb Memories : highly detailed and vivid 'snapshot' of the moment when a surprising and emotionally arousing event happened.
They are influenced by the cultural impact on things and the personal emotional reaction. They are affected by the proximity to the event that is being remembered.
Reception Context : the context that someone hears the news of an events/memory
Flashbulb memories are sometimes considered less affected by the forgetting curve than other memories.
Flashbulb Memories II
Special mechanism hypothesis : explanation of flashbulb memories as a special biological memory mechanism created by an event exceeding critical levels of surprise, creating a permeant record of details and circumstances surrounding the experience.
Importance Driven Model : Emphasis personal consequences over emotional response
Biological Support of Flashbulb Memories : The Amygdala is thought to play a critical role in the formation of emotional memories (Sharlot et al) It makes sense that the brain would ensure information of fearful memories would be stored in good detail. Adrenaline helps remember things (evolutionary advantage.)
Comments
No comments have yet been made