Chapter 5 Labour and Conservative governments 1964-79
- Created by: K4typ
- Created on: 08-06-18 13:48
Harold Wilson's Leadership of the Labour Party 196
Labour appeared united had glossed over their divisions in Nuclear Weapons, Europe and Nationalism
Presented the Labour party as modern dynamic and progressive
- Manifesto/ policies -
- faster economic growth and Full employment
- improved welfare and health services
- better housing and education
Wilson hoped to - "Harness science to our economic planning"
create - "Britain that is going to be forged in the white heat of this {technological and scientific revolution"
Wilson appeared classless
Why did Labour win the 1964 election ?
- Harold Wilson's Leadership of the party
- How the electorate regarded the conservatives
- The Revival of the Liberal party
- Changes in British society during the 1950's
How did the electorate regarded the conservatives
- At the end of conservative years of domination, 1951-63 many voters blamed them for the growing economic problems
- They did not have answers for the rising unemployment, inflation or industrial unrest
- Conservatives seemed out of touch with modern society
- Alec-douglas home PM 1963-64 old Etonian
- Had been involved in sex scandals
The Revival of The Liberal Party
- Gained 3 seats in the 1964 election and doubled their votes
- Many discontented Tory voters who were not ready to vote Labour voted liberal
Changes in British society in the 1950s
- Due to the increase in living standards and the greater availability of credit it in the 1950's it meant young people where more independent and less traditionalist
- Changing attitudes affected by opinions projected in the media, tv, books ect
This led to
- Young people wanting a classless, modern Britain
- This benefited the Labour Party
Why was the result of the 1964 election so close?
if 900 voters had voted Tory instead of Labour the conservatives would have won
Douglas-Home's leadership had been a better PM than expected
Willson was considered to be cunning
Conservative tax cuts before the election meant earnings rose
Unemployment had dropped before the election from 900,000 to 300,000 by July 1964
Attitudes to Labour -
- people distrusted its links to the unions
- disliked the commitment to nationalism
- people wondered if its unexperienced leaders would handle crisis well
- people opposed to immigration so people voted Tory
How Effective was Harold Wilson as PM? 1964-70
Wilson's problems as PM
- Only had a majority of four seats
- needed to fulfill the promise to modernize British society
- members of government talented - but disliked each other
- economic situation serious
His characteristics
- Optimistic, patient cool in a crisis
- Kind, charming and generous
- sought compromise rather than conflict
- accepted by both halves of his party
Labour government's small majority
After 1964 election had a majority of four
After 1966 election government returned with a majority of 96
Wilson 1964-70 avoided splits
However, people blamed tories for country's difficulties
The transformation of British Society
Roy-Jenkins home secretary undertook task of modernizing British society - acts below
Nov 1965 - Murder - Temporary abolition of the death penalty made permanent in 1969
Nov 1965 Race Relations - Discrimination in public facilities illegal
June 1967 Family Planning - Contraception available to all on the NHS
July 1967 Sexual offences - Homosexual acts in private between consenting adults legalised
Oct 1967 Abortion under certain conditions legalized
April 1968 Race Relations - discrimination in housing and employment illegal
July 1968 Theatres Censorship of plays by Lord Chamberlin ended
May 1969 Voting age lowered from 21 to 18
Oct 1969 Divorce - process simplified and made less costly
May 1970 Equal Pay - both genders receive the same pay for the same work
The transformation of British Society
- Social change in 1950's
- increased prosperity meant people traveled more less class division
- more education, a higher standard of living less respect for tradition
- youth culture
- more employment opportunities for women higher demands for equality
Social reform led to outrage from traditionalists
Death penalty had been popular
The transformation of British Society ; Race Relat
People arrived from the commonwealth - took lower paid jobs
Immigration unpopular with labor voters in inner-city areas
The government introduced race relations acts to attempt to slow immigration and deal with discrimination
not overly successful
The transformation of British Society; Education P
- People opposed to 11+ exam and the grammar school system
- 1963 Robbins Report - called for an expansion of univeristy education
- 1965 Anthony Crosland the education secretary introduced new comprehensive schools for children of all abilities
- led to controversy as grammar schools had been offering opportunities that had only otherwise been open to those attending independent schools
- Harold Wilson also introduced the open university - part-time courses
Foreign and Colonial Issues
- Wilson had maintained party unity and balance over social reforms
- foreign and colonial issues more of a strain
The Vietnam War
- Wilson believed Britain's economic recovery and security depended on the Americans
- Wilson said we support..."the American stand against the communist infiltration in South Vietnam"
- BUT... To appease the left of the party criticised US bombing of N Vietnam 1966
- 1967 he attempted to make a broker peace deal
Southern Rhodesia 1965
What - Illegal declaration of independence made with a white minority government
Labour wanted and commonwealth countries wanted the government to send troops in to crush the rebellion. Britain used economic sanctions instead
Wilson used personal diplomacy and made a generous offer which the PM of Rhodesia refused - let Wilson off the hook
Foreign and Colonial Issues; The Common Market
- Harold Wilson hoped he could change de Gaulle's decision to veto British entry. He didn't change his mind in 1967
- Application a success - pro-Europeans happy and anti-Europeans by its failure
Harold Wilson's management of the labour cabinet 1
- Effectively passed modernising social policy
- Avoided splits over foreign issue
- only four cabinet resignations
However...
- Often quarrels over policy
- Conflict betwixt personalities
Barbra castle 1968 - We spend three quarters of our time in these personal pro and anti intrugues instead of getting down to real jobs
How Successful were the economic policies of the 1
Britain's economic difficulties in the 1960's
1950 economic performance behind economic competitors
Labour inherited a £800 million pound balance of payment's deficit
Belived this was due to lack of British lack of competitiveness
To solve this they felt goods needed to be better/cheaper than foreign products this required british firms too
- Improve their efficieny by investing in new technology and machinery
- grant wage increases only if workers were more productive
The government need to
- use revenue from taxation to develop and improve britains transport network
- maintain investment in the nationalised industries
- ensure that Britain had a well-trained workforce
Economists also argued Britain's trade unions cont
- In times of inflation, union leaders threatened strike actions to demand wage increases for their members.
- Unions strongly resisted attempts by the government to use its power to try to restrict pay increases or to make wages dependant on improved productivity
- Any wage increase not linked to an improvement in productivity made industry costs higher and increased inflation.
- Higher labor costs made goods more expensive and contributed to the balance of payments deficit.
- Higher labor costs also reduced the amount of profit that employers could invest in research and development, new machinery and plant.
The Labour government had to take account of the demands of the trade unions
- The Labour party was allied to the trade unions who provided most of its money
- in the 1960's almost half of the British workforce belonged to a trade union
The economic policies of the Wilson Government 196
Had to tackle balance of payments deficit else the UK would gain a reputation for economic incompetence.
Deflation - tax cuts and or rises in government expenditure
Decrease free credit + reduce the spending power of industries --> decrease in import bill --> decrease gap between imports and exports
Devaluation - Reduces exchange value of the pound. Make british products cheaper + boost exports. Solve balance of payments crisis but as Britain relies on imports --> rise in cost of living
Deflationary measures
Wilson ruled out devaluation because...
- it would reduce savings of working-class families --> Labour should be protecting these people
- Devaluation had destroyed in 1931 + 49 government
- As Wilson had a small majority it meant he would have to call an election soon
- He didn't want to upset the Americans. US had BoP Deficit Us treasury feared if British devalued the pound it would led to currency traders assuming US were doing the same --> run on the pound
However, 1964 deflationary measures were introduced
- Callaghan negotiated foreign loans to prevent a run on the pound BUT to get them had to agree to the maintenance of Eastern bases
The National Plan, September 1965
Wilson hoped to make British industry more competitive
He created the Department of economic affairs
Aim: to create a plan to modernise and improve Britain's economy
Targets set by DEA for the economy: annual growth rates of 3.8% over 6 years
An increase in exports in 5.25% per annum to wipe out the balance of payments deficit
DEA needed the government to:
- Create a national board for prices and incomes = wages dependant on increased productivity
- Provide investment funds for modernisation of British industry
- improvement of workers skills and regional development
Department of economic affairs was undermined by;
Treasury as they did not cooperate with the DEA
Dea undermined by deflationary measures
NBPI had no power to inforce decisions as Unions did not support the policy of wage restraint
Results of deflationary measures and national plan
Result of the National Plan;
Contributed to Labour victory in March 1966
DEA due to to infighting with the treasury was wound up in 1969
Result of Deflationary measures
Reduction of the balance of payments deficit
prevention of a run on the pound due to loans
Devaluation 1967
- May 1966 seamen striked for pay increases over government guidelines
- The strike damaged exports and poor trade figures threatened another run on the pound
- by 1967 unemployment was high - 2.5 million
- another balance of payments deficit put the pound under pressure
18th November 1967 the pound was devalued
it went from being worth $2.80 to $2.40How successful was it
Not very, it was slow to improve trade figures and did not prevent cuts in spending
Other changes
- January 1968 announcement that all British forces east of Suez where to be withdrawn by 1971
School leaving age from 15 to 16 deferred change from 1971 to 73
Deflation 1968 / The economic record of Labour
Roy Jenkins delivered more deflation and increased taxation by £923 million value of Stirling rose and interest rates were reduced
- The economic record of Labour
- Labour had been no more successful than Tories in tackling the economic weakness of Britain.
- the rate of inflation had not been slowed + unemployment was higher in 1970 thn in 1964
- Wilson's government did not achieve ambitious aims of modernising the country and planning a competitive productive economy
High Defense expenditure and the investment in research and development
Money for research and development went into the military --> reduced investment in other sectors
Lack of investment
- Encouraged manufacturing sites in Wales, Scotland and Merseyside these then undermined by deflationary policies
- Did try to improve transport network by building motorways
How successfully did the Labour goverment deal wit
Wilson hoped to win trade union support over modernisation but economic difficulties it created a rif
- Stikes for pay were often unofficial, contributed to inflation and British poor export performance
- industrial relations needed to be more strongly regulated if the government's efforts to control prices and wages were to succeed
Trade unions argued
Lack of competitiveness should be blamed on employers and government investment policies
government attempts to limit wage increases unfairly penalized low paid workers.
The government had difficulties reforming industrial relations as unions had previously been allies and provided labour with money.
The unions had bargaining power
Strikes in nationalised industries could cause disruption throughout the country.
In place of strife 1969
Barbra Castle - leader of employment and productivity ministry
In place of strife proposals
- Ensure employees had legal right to join a trade union
- The government could order a ballot if they believed a strike was a threat to national interest
- In unofficial disputes, there would be a 28 day cooling off period.
- Disputes to be referred to an industrial commission whos decision where legally binding
- Workers who were unfairly dismissed entitled to compensation or get their jobs back
The result of In place of Strife
TUC and Left-wing Labour MP's incensed
Resistance in the party led by the home-secretary Callaghan
the failure contributed to the fall of the Labour government - showed unions had too much power and they were an obstacle to economic progress
Changes in Unions
Traditional industries declined - largest unions lost power
White collar employment grew - increase in public sector union membership
However private sector grew --> union decreases as a whole
END OF THE 1964-70 HAROLD WILSON GOVERNMENT
Harold wilson looses the election in 1970
He decided to call an election due to mending economy and good opinion polls
Did the Result of the 1970 general election owe mo
Why the Labour Party Lost in 1970
Wilson's Complacency - Wilson had a 51% approval rating vs Edward Heath with 28%
Publication of poor trade figures disproved the theory that the economy was on the mend
Disillusionment of the Labour Party
- Richard Crossman thought that too many Labour supporters did not bother to vote
- Barbra castle felt there was a detachment amoung the Labour supporters
- Too much money spent on defence not enough on welfare education and economic revitalisation
- maintaining the value of sterling had benefited only the city of London and US
- labour had abandoned its commitment to socialism
- britain had been too supportive of the USA especially over Vietnam
The failure of In place of strife
People impressed by Wilson's promise to modernise Britain - the failure of in place of strife showed that unions were selfish and had more power than the government
The failure of In place of strife People impresse
Why the conservatives won
Conservative policy proposals
Used years in opposition to develop principles to underpin their policies
- Industrial relations law would be reformed to reduce strikes and inflationary pay settlements
- Less state intervention in industry
- Attempts to control prices and incomes by law would end
- Britain would apply to join the EEC
Edward Heath's Leadership
Heath attacked the economic record of Labour - since 1964 inflation as measured by the retail price index had risen by 33%
Daily express praised his "guts and Leadership"
He dealt firmly with a challenge to his authority when he sacked Enoch Powell from the Shadow cabinet
How Successful was Edward Heath as PM? 1970-74
He promised to
- Strengthen the economy and curb inflation
- Legislate to transform industrial relation
- Create one nation, promising regional development, faster economic growth, better social services and the maintenance of full employment
- Apply to join the EEC common market, believing that membership would facilitate these objectives
Policy Proposals
Hoped to allow market forces to determine prices and wages and would be less involved in managing the economy
Overall his aim's and economic policies were not that different from Harold Wilson's 64-70 policies
Heath's economic record
- Tories inherited inflation rate of circa 5%
- Unemployment same between 1970-74
- However, days lost to strikes doubled
- He inherited a balance of payments surplus but left a deficit
Decide how much can be blamed on his decisions and how much on adverse circumstances eg he presided over the time of the "World economic Blizzard"
Heath's successful application to the EEC
Britain became a member of the European economic community 1793
Tory votes for 39 MP's against
69 Labour who theoretically against joining voted for joining
Heath felt EEC would give Britain better access to Europe's markets
De Gaulle left office 1969 new president not opposed Pompidou agreed on grounds that britain would;
- Sacrifice any remaining preferential trade deals with the Commonwealth
- Accept the EEC policy of heavily subsidising French farmers
The Industrial relations act, Aug 1971
- There was support for an attempt to curb strikes.
- The aim of the Industrial relations act; to balance rights of workers and unions while reducing likelihood of strikes
- Workers would have legal right to Join a trade union - Challenged legality of closed shop
- National Industrial relations court and industrial relations commission were established
- Trade Unions required to register with NIRC + IRC
- Members of registered unions would enjoy better protection against unfair dismissal
- Failure to register meant unions liable for claims for damages
- gave gov power to order a pre-strike ballot and 60 day cooling of period
- Outcome; Failure
- Similar to in place of strife = unpopular
TUC told members to defy act - Increased the bitterness of confrontations between unions and employers
- complicated heaths effort to negotiate with TUC over strikes about prices and wages
Heath less successful in managing industrial relations, more strikes due to the act but mainly due to inflation. Prices rose = workers striked to prevent living standards falling
Inflation in the early 1970's why was it so bad
- 1971 - Nixon ended the system of fixed exchange rates --> devaluation of the dollar --> made british exports more expensive in the USA
- 1972 - Pound allowed to float freely - the value determined by money markets = imports became more expensive
- Worldwide increase in commodity prices; prices of raw materials food and fuel
- Heath government aimed to stimulate growth - cut taxes increased public spending - stimulated demand for good but pushed up prices
The Miners Strike, January to February 1972
- Miners had sympathy for doing a dangerous job
- they wanted a 47% pay increase = above the government's wage policy
- January 1972, 280,000 coal miners striked
- The government was forced to declare a state of emergency
- Regular power cuts throughout the country and a 3 day week
- Why was it successful
- Miners were well organised under Arthur Scargill + they used flying pickets
- There were violent incidents eg Birmingham - 15,000 mased pickets prevented fuel leaving the depot
- The government was poorly organised + winter weather had an immediate impact on power supplies
It damaged the government because
encouraged others to strike, added to inflationary pressures, made the gove look weak, emphasised failure of the act
Heath's U-turn in economic policy 1792
Heaths intention - reduce state intervention in industry however....
- 1971 - Rolls royce aircraft division was nationalised when it faced bankruptcy
- 1972 - Upper Clyde shipbuilders where granted £35 million to safeguard 3000 jobs
- A new ministry for industrial development was set up in April to provide industry in deprived regions as part of the government's plan to stimulate growth
- Failure to secure a voluntary agreement with the union over wages --> statutory policies in 1972 to regulate prices and pay increases but success was destroyed by the oil shock of October 1973
The Oil price shock of 1973 and the 3 day week
- October 1973 Egypt and Syria waged war against Isreal
- They became angry at western support --> cutbacks on supplies and quadrupled prices
- Britain 50% dependant on oil
- November 1973 Miners striked for higher wages
- December State of emergency declared --> 3-day working week
- Electricity supplied to industry and businesses 3 days per week
- max 50mph on all roads
- no television after 10:30 pm
1974 election
- Edward Heath called the 1974 election to gain support for government policies
- The result was unclear --> Harold Wilson became PM again (1974-76)
How effectively did Wilson and Callaghan deal with
Minority government
Labour achieved a majority of 3 seats
Relations with the Trade Unions
Labour and TUC reached an agreement = "The Social contract, 1973"
- Unions agreed to cooperate to try and control wages increases
- Free collective bargaining over wages + no statutory incomes policy
- The government would try to keep prices down and provide improved welfare benefits
Outcome - did not solve economic difficulties, co-operation continued until 1978-79
The drift to the left in the Labour Party
reflected in cabinet appointments - Micheal foot and Tony Benn
Also occurred at a local level
caused it difficulties in the 1980's
Labour Division's over Europe and Wilson resignati
Wilson promised to renagotiate terms with the EEC
New terms - Britain's contribution to the EEC budget was decreased
Referendum called in 1975
Outcome 2:1 for continued membership
Appeared to preserve Labour party Unity
Wilson's resignation March 1976
He was replaced by James Callaghan
Economic difficulties; stagflation
1974 miners strike solved by 29% pay increase
1975 mid - inflation rose to circa 30% - unions demanding higher wages
A world recession hit British exports --> economic slump + unemployment
- Denis Healey (C of th Excqr) thought - economic recovery depended on conquering inflation
- 1975 - increased taxes cut government spending programmes
- 1975 July formal incomes policy introduced
- £6 ceiling on wage increases per week then £4 in 1976
- freeze on higher incomes
- Result - decrease in average level of wage increases
Inflation level dropped but economic recovery did not prevail
1976 - there was a Crisis of confidence in the pound - falling exchange value threatened to push up prices of British imports and increase inflation
Bank of England brought pounds on the foreign exchange to prop up value but used up large amounts of nations currency reserves - Threat of National Bankruptcy
The IMF Loan, 1976, The Lib-Lab pact 1977-78
- The international monetary fund- provides loans to enable members to overcome balance of payments deficit
- 1976 - asked for a loan of $3900 but government had to cut spending by £2 billion
- This was accepted in December BUT Did deepen riff in Labour
- Callaghan prevented a severe economic crisis from becoming a political one and preserved unity of his cabinet and kept the government in office
The Lib-Lab pact 1977-78
- Economic problems undermined public confidence in the government
- 1976 Labour lost the majority in the commons
- 1977 Callaghan negotiated with Liberal leader David Steel for the Liberals to prop up the Labour government, pact lasted until 1978
The Winter of Discontent 1978-9
- Government's strategy for controlling inflation dependant on unions agreeing to pay rises of no more than 5%
- Unions felt Chancellor Healey had abandoned the Social contract and that members were suffering under the government's counter-inflation policy -->
- December 1978 - ford workers won a 15% pay increase after a 3 month strike -->
- strikes from Lorry drivers, grave diggers, dustmen members of the NUPE Union
Outcome; Government appeared weak, Callaghan complacent
Pay rises were granted and implied government couldn't control economy or unions
The end of the Labour government in 1979
- The government had promised to devolve some power to Wales and Scotland but after referenda didn't get enough votes for this to happen.
- Nationalists felt annoyed and voted conservative
- government lost by 1 vote
Comments
No comments have yet been made