AS Government & Politics Unit:2, Topic:3 (The core executive)
- Created by: SabertoothTiger
- Created on: 26-05-14 12:25
Core Executive
- R. A. W. Rhodes - "act as final arbiters of conflict between different parts of the gov't machine"
- Office of PM - largely based on convention.
- Styles of political leadership based on "events, dear boy, events" - Macmillan
- Robert Peel seen as the first modern PM, Robert Walpole official first PM
Sources of Prime Ministerial Power
- Formal powers - under royal prerogative - now exercised by PM not Monarch, e.g. declare war, sign treaties, control civil service
- Emerged through convention - by convention that citizens, party, parl., cabinet and key officials have to submit themselves to the PM authority - to a greater or lesser extent regarding convention
- PM's role as leader of maj. party in Commons - power and authority rests upon confidence of Commons - which in a maj. gov't is in turn dependent on the confidence +support of those sitting on his/her benches
Roles of PM
- 1. Chief executive
- 2. Chief legislator
- 3. Chief diplomat
- 4. Public relations chief
- 5. Party chief
- 6. Head of both foreign and domestic affairs
Absense of a codified constitution formally detailing his/her powers. Commentators have therefore formulated their own lists.
"Elective dictatorship" - former Cons. Minister Lord Hailsham 1976 (increasing exec. dom.)
Last PMs:
- 1. Cameron
- 2. Brown
- 3. Blair
- 4. Major
- 5. Thatcher
Powers of PM
- Powers of patronage - (IMP.) - "de facto chief executive" - most significant is the power to appoint and dismiss ministers at cabinet level and below - Thatcher removed 'wets' and appointed Cecil to support her and her 'drys'
- Powers over cabinet, gov't + civil service - e.g. structure and composition of the Cabinet - first coalition cabinet - 16 Cons and 5 LDs
- Powers over Parl. - Can tailor all discussion to suit PM's party - domination. - can rely on a degree of party loyalty, whips importance too. PM can even threaten the queen to dissolve Parl. as a means of forcing rebels from their party into line. - Tactic adopted by J. Major over some votes reglating to the Maastricht Treaty in 1993 and 1994.
- Power over the agenda - agenda setting and policy-making - incumbent has a key role. - largely responsible for the Queen's speech
- Powers on world stage - rooted in the prerogative powers to make war and conclude treaties, but also been enhanced by the rise of mass media powers - not seen as high as the President of the USA though
Limits on PM power
- Cabinet - poor cabinet appointments can limit power. Some people demand inclusion in the Cabient - e.g. William Hague 2010. Or sometimes PM can use people for an ideological balance - e.g. John Prescott 199, Ken Clarke 2010. Or as a reward - e.g.George Osborne 2010
- If PM leaves out people they can become powerful enemies on the backbenches - e.g. Michael Heseltine under Thatcher or Robin Cook/Clare Short under Blair
- Abuse of PM's powers - bring criticism e.g. Mo Mowlam "control freakery" of Blair, threats of resignation e.g. G. Howe and N. Lawson (1989). PMs can face difficulties if their ideas fail, e.g. Thatcher - Poll Tax, Balir over Iraq
- Parl. - can cause embarrassment. can remove w/ aVoNC - e.g. Callaghan 1979, or attempt on Major 1993 - defeated
- Party - Backbench confidence, e.g. Thatcher - challenge from Heseltine in 1990 - resignation. Blair also had massive backbench rebellions
- Public opinion - PM accountable to the public - e.g. opinion poll results
- Own abilities/circumstances - 1. Majority?, 2. Economy? 3. Coalition ... (main factors) "The office of the PM is what its holder chooses and is able to make of it" - Asquith.
Cabinet
- Bagehot - "efficient secret" of Brit. Pol. system in C19.
- PM controls the cabinet with the powers of patronage
- around 23 paid members usually.
- CABINET COMMITTEES - chaired by either PM or other snr. cabinet mmbers. Committees fall under different categories, - domestic/home affairs, foreign and defence, and economic.
- FULL cabinet increasingly seen as a 'rubber-stamping' body.
- CABINET OFFICE - (CO) - key player in coordinating the activities of gov't. Strengthened by Labour in 2001 - office compromised of 2,000 staff, also physical centralisation of the CO, relocated to new offices in Downing Street.
- - (other) - 1990 Thatcher forced to resign after losing support of her cabinet colleagues
- COLLETIVE RESPONSIBILITY - Collective decision making body - Lab. PM Harold Wilson suspended this during referendum campaign on continued membership of EC 1975.
- - Undermined by bilaterals
Roles and functions of cabinet/cabinet ministers
- Doctrine of collective responsibility
- Decision-making - "buckle" joining the exec. and the leg. - Bagehot, but undermined by increased use of bilaterals - key decisions being taken elsewhere, e.g. decisions over Millennium Dome 1997
- Coordinating departments - Role in coordinating the activities of gov't departments. Decision-making role of cabinet has diminished somewhat this remains
- Forward planning - Addressing porblems arising from policy and/or events. Provides 'talking shop' where broad direction of a polocy can be re-focused. Can also raise genuine concerns and deal with unexpected events
Changes under Blair
- Reduced cabinet meetings to a single, 45 minute session each week. - preferred bilateral meetings elsewhere. Mo Mowlam and others used the term 'sofa government'.
Different models of exec. control
- Cabinet gov't - PM merely 'primus inter pares', decision-making body - collective respons. decline of this type of gov't!
- Prime Ministerial cliques/'kitchen cabinet' - Thatcher+Blair, - cabinet is merely a rubber stamp
- Departmentalised gov't - Ministers accountable for their decisions - gov't departments have control over their own areas - ministers act with a degree of autonomy
- Differentiated/segmented decisions - degree of prime ministerial dominance varies in different polocy areas - other areas other responsibilities
- Prime Ministerial gov't - "elective dictatorship". de facto president - Balir and Thatcher had such large majorities - could pass most legislation - even radical
Prime ministerial or presidential power?
President -
Lots of power, lots of checks
PM -
Considerable power, few real checks
President of USA has more foreign power, prime minister has great domestic policy scope
Yet more of a side issue - as not to do with their actual rooted powers - more how they use them
Types of leadership
- SPATIAL LEADERSHIP - developed by M. Foley - Blair is an example, create visible difference between PM and machines of gov't
- CULT OF THE OUTSIDER - characterising themselves as 'outsiders' fighting against formal structures
- PUBLIC LEADERSHIP - Sought to appeal directly to the public through social media....
- PERSONAL FACTOR - 'expanded personalities'
Organisation of gov't departments
- Ministers -> Junior Ministers -> Parliamentary Private Secretaries
- Each gov't department headed by a secretary of state (minsiters)
- E.g.s of ministers - Thresa May (home secretary), Michael Gove (Education Secretary)
- COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY - stand by decisions publically made within cabinet. Those who are not prepared to do this are expected to resign - e.g. Robin Cook Iraq 2003.
- INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY - personal respon. e.g. Foreign Secretary Lord Carrington's resignation in the wake of the Argentinean invasion of the Falklands in 1981
Civil Service
- Administrative or bureaucratic arm of government - top four grades within the snr vicil service (c. 1,000 staff) have trad. had greatest input into policy
- CIVIL SERVICE REFORM (1979-2005) -
- Been criticised for being ineffiecient and obstructive - been affected by two key developments:
- 1. the 'hiving-off' of many responsibilities to semi-autonomous agencies - called Next Steps agencies (Thatcher)
- 2. Rise of special advisers - (spin-doctors)
- Some say these changes have resulted in politicisation of the service
- Fulton Report (1968) - criticised the civil service's amateurish approach, although full proposals never fully implemented - service underwent major changes betwen 1979-1990.
- Derek Rayner's Efficiency Unit - led to the Financial Management Initiative (FMI) - sought to introduce a more business-like culture to the service.
- Staff numbers fell from 750,000 (1979) to 600,000 (1990)
- The Next Steps Programme - from 1988 resulted in a process of agencification. By 1990 75% of all civil servants were employed by such agencies. John Major's Citizen's Charter 1991 emphasised the import. of quality in pub. services - need for greater forward planning - IMPACT: some civil servants becoming publicly known and identified as being responsible for the execution of policy (e.g. Head of Child Support Agency) 1990-12agencies, 2005-130 !
Characteristics and roles of civil service
- IMPARTIALITY - Theory: civil servants should not be asked to perform political functions Practice: undermined by rise of special advisers since 1979
- ANONYMITY - Theory: Should not be named publically Practice: Public criticism of named civil servants over policy undermined this theory - e.g. over Westland affair in 1986 - and by rise of agencies where civil servants seem responsible not ministers (e.g. Prison Service)
- PERMANENCE - Theory: Should remain in office even following a change in gov't Practice: undermined by fixed-term contracts
CONFIDENTIALITY? - some say this should be added as a fourth principle - leaks and other events have served to undermine this - Sarah Tisdall sentences to 6 months' imprisonment in 1983 for leaking details of the arrival of cruise missiles at Greenham Common
Role of the civil service
- Research
- Policy advice
- Policy execution
- Departmental administration
- Ensuring continuity and a smooth transition between gov'ts
SPECIAL ADVISERS -
- undermine the civil service
- Roles - 1. Make the gov't less reliant on the work of the civil service, and 2. to help the PM keep up-to-date with often far better staffed and resourced gov't departments
- 5 SA in 1990 - 108 in 2003
- 'Spin doctors' - politicalisation of civil service
- Lots of scanals including spin doctors - e.g. Jo Moore - Stephen Byers' media adviser who on 9/11 said it was a "good day to bury bad news" 2002 departure
Relationship between ministers and civil servants
- 1. Formal constitutional model - Civil servants serve ministers, providing information but preserving impartiality, and therefore anonymity and permanence
- 2. Adversarial model - Minsiters and civil servants = struggle for power. Civil service has its own agenda - seeks to obstruct gov't
- 3. Village life in the Whitehall community model - Ministers within the department provide the vision and drive - civil servants fill in the detail
- 4. Bureaucratic expansionism model - Civil servants serve their own interests by creating bureaucratic empires that are financially inefficient and get in the way of effective gov't
Theoretical working of the civil service - "Ministers decide, servants advise"
Servants or masters?
SERVANTS:
- control information given to ministers
- focused on one area (ministers usually have many commitments e.g. John Prescott)
- Larger network
- More experience and knowledge on department
MINSTERS:
- Final power
- Use of special advisers
'Yes Minister' model -
Civil service essentially overpowered and controlled the minister - many thought this satirical show was all too realistic
Comments
No comments have yet been made