Agriculture and Industry 1949-65
- Created by: rakso181
- Created on: 20-05-16 16:08
1950 Agarian Reform Law
- Portrays landlords as ruling class
- Mao wants to rally peasants onto his side
- Needed a claim that he'd successfully adapted Marxism to China
Attacks on landlordism and redistribution of land
- Eradication of landlord class
- Military help to silence hostiles and help Party officials organise Work Teams
- Work teams calculate how much tax people owe depending on their land, label villagers, and create anti-landlord paranoia
- Public humiliation with possessions confiscated and divided amongst other peasants - victims often executed or beaten up by other villagers - shows a peasant-led revolution
- End of 1951 - 10 million landlords lose land and 40% land changes hands
- Death toll between 700K and 3 million
Moves towards agricultural co-operation
- Moves towards collectivisation due to new class of landowners - measured approach taken of about 15 years
- 1951 - groups of about 10 families encouraged into MATs (Mutual Aid Teams) to pool equipment, livestock and labour
- 1952 - successful MATs converted to APCs (Agricultural Producers' Co-operatives) of 40-50 families - keep private ownership
- Many APCs rushed into being made, leaving many in debt from buying equipment
- Mao calls for slowdown in spring 1953 - things stabilise by 1954 but many start selling food and land
- Mao calls the slowdown a 'rash retreat' and renews pressure on APCs
- Rural protest due to grain requisitioning during poor harvest 1954
- Mao calls for 'Stop, Contract and Develop' for next 18 months
Moves towards agricultural co-operation (ctd.)
- July 1955 - Mao calls for all-out collectivisation - 17 million houses July 1955 to 75 million January 1956
- Many new APCs become higher HPCs with 200-300 households - no longer own land/equipment and profits based on work points
Impacts of agricultural co-operation
Politically:
- Carried out quickly
- Party control increased
- Shows Mao's authority
Ideologically:
- Own means of food, land and production
Socially:
- Nobody owns their own land
- Peasants seen as servants of the party rather than allies
Impacts of agricultural co-operation (ctd.)
Economically:
- Low labour productivity
- Low cultivated land per head
- 1st FYP - food production only increases by 3.8% per annum - not enough to feed growing indus. workforce
People's Communes: Reasons
- Continue the revolution - didn't want it to be becalmed by bureaucrats
- Pool larger resources of equip. and labour - higher food yields and more peasants freed for construction projects
- More manpower for water control projects in winter 1957-58
People's Communes: Organisation
- 'Walking on Two Legs'
- Modern economy: farmers - grain - indus. workers - steel
- Expand communes and mobilise workforce for water conservancy projects
- First commune is Sputnik with over 27 collectives and 9K houses
- Internal passport system introduced - unable to move anywhere without one
- 750K collectives into 26K communes with 120 million houses
People's Communes: Communal living
- Same as before only with an added sense of communal identity
- Workers divided into production brigades
- Tractor stations provided
- Become units of local government (public health, education, policing etc.)
- Abandoned 'bourgeois' emotional attatchements for regimented lifestyle - ideals of utopian socialism
- Frees people up from domestic jobs
- Communes planned to expand into cities
People's Communes: Abolition of private farming
- All private property surrendered
- Communist values become the norm
- No motivation to work with everyone receiving the same rewards
- Competition within communes - lack of sleep and stealing of supplies
- Loss of personal freedoms and possessions creating a military dimension
- Men between 15-50 must join the militia
People's Communes: Lysenkoism
- Trofim Lysenko - Ukrainian agricultural scientist who Stalin relied on during the Great Famine of the 30s
- 1958 - made an official policy in China with an 8-point programme
- Potentially dangerous ideas - 1000s peasant homes destroyed for soil fertilisation - pest control results in insect manifestation after culling of birds
People's Communes: The Great Famine (1958-62)
- Mao announces the whole country had been collectivised into 26K communes
Reasons:
- Mao trying to mobilise masses for engineering projects whilst launching the 2nd FYP
- Substistence farmers expected to provide huge surpluses for communes
- Too much acceptance of Lysenkoism
- Technical experts purged in Antis campaigns
- Cadres issue overly enthusiastic reports to please superiors
- Lack of reward and private ownership damages productivity
- Mao prioritises industrialising China over millions of peasant lives
- Could have been prevented if Mao had listened to Peng Duhai at the Lushan Conference
People's Communes: The Great Famine (ctd.)
What happened?
- 30-50 million deaths
- Worse in rural regions - 25% Tibetan pop. wiped out to destroy their identity
- Wives and children sold, prostitution, banditry and some cases of cannibalism
The First Five Year Plan (1952-56)
Why its not immediately introduced:
- Sort out nationalist opposition
- Reward peasants for their revolutionary support with land redistribution
- Reduce inflation rate from 1000%
1st FYP: USSR Financial and technical support
- Despite difficulties between Russia and China, Russia was still an inspiration
- 1951 - inflation rate cut down to 15% through cuts on public spending, increases in tax and replacing the Chinese dollar with the Yuan
- Sino-Soviet treaty 1950 arranges Soviet advisors to come to China - over 10K civilian technicians bring specialist knowledge
- Russia lend China $100 million which China had to pay back with loans and bullion stocks
- Adoption of Lysenkoism
- 'Soviet brutalist'style buildings replace classical Chinese buildings
- Chinese delegates visit Moscow to train in propoganda and governmental organisation
1st FYP: Targets
- Make PRC self-sufficient in food and manufactured goods to protect China from a Capitalist world
- Set from above by economic planners rather than in response to consumer demand
- Resources towards heavy industry
- Fear from 'five antis' brings private ownership to an end in 1956
- People encouraged to invest into patriotic saving schemes - which is directed into indus.
1st FYP: Successes and Failures
Successes:
- More migrate to cities - 57 million 1949 to 100 million 1957
- Urban living standards improve - wages and job security increase
- Most sectors reach targets - annual growth rate at 7%
Failures:
- Figures unreliable
- Soviet guidance higlights shortcomings in workers' skill and literacy
- Competition for resources between private and SOEs - unresolved until end of private ownership 1956
The Second Five Year Plan (1958-62)
Reasons:
- Economic
- Industrialisation depends on a more productive agric. to feed workers
- Conservatives want a 'carrot' approach with consumer goods and higher food prices
- Radical hardliners want a 'stick' approach with food requisition and punishment for slackers - Mao finds this too risky as 70% of the party are peasants
- Political
- Mao wants to show China's independence
- Go from socialism to communism by 'walking on two legs'
- Personal
- Mao's confidence high with rapid collec., his successful provincial tour 1958 and impressive work on water conservancy schemes
- Local cadres want to prove their credentials in light of the anti-rightist campaigns
2nd FYP: Backyard Furnaces
- Autumn 1957 - Mao says steel prod. will x4 over next 4 years
- Dec 1957 - Liu Shaoqui says China will overtake Britain in steel and iron over next 10 years
- 1958 steel target from 6-8 million in May to 10.7 in September
- Mao orders backyard furnace campaign to acheive these targets
- Families urged to build their own - becomes more important than education
- Sep 1958: 14% China's steel from Backyard furnaces - October: 49%
- Spring 1959 - leadership realise only large smelting plants are making quality steel
- Economicaly and ecologically damaging - vast amount of woodland destroyed for fuel
2nd FYP: SOEs and construction projects
SOEs:
- Nationalisation in 1956 - incentives removed to work harder
- 'Iron bowl' - workers enjoy high job security, high wages and medical benefits
- No longer any bargaining for better conditions
Construction projects:
- Water conservancy projects in late 1957 with millions of peasant workers
- Some irrigation schemes are complete disasters - Three Gate Gorge Dam designed to control flow of Yellow River but is rebuilt within a year
- Colossal costs of lives and labour with only some relatively successful
- Increase in salinisation (salt in the soil)
- Expert advice brushed away if it threatens delay
2nd FYP: Successes and Failures
Succeses:
- Increase in output of raw materials - 131 tonnes coal 1957 to 290 tonnes 1959
- 1964 - development of nucelar weapons
Failures:
- Inadequate quality control threatens China's reputation as a trading partner
- Leadership lack basic managerial and technical skills
- Lack of planning makes Mao's lack of scientific/technical knowledge clear
- 1962 - 1/2 heavy indus. goods and 3/4 light indus. goods than 1958
- Slow prod. epecially in manufactured goods
2nd FYP: Lushan Conference (July 1959)
- Assess the Great Leap Forward (2nd FYP) at the end of its first year
- Mao brings Jiang Qing to use her influence on the Shanghai wing of the party
- Only Peng Duhai stands up to Mao - isolated as a trouble maker and sacked
Results:
- Economic - GLF can continue, embarking on a 'second leap' and pushing on agriculture
- Political - Made clear that Mao's only critic could be himself
The Third Five Year Plan (1963-65)
- Liu Shaoqui and Deng Xiaoping put in charge:
- Break up communes
- More realistic targets set
- Relaxation of persecution to help factories reach targets
- Most initiatives drawn up by Chen Yun - Yun was good at presenting facts to Mao by blaming the people who carried his orders out
- Shift back to centralised control
- Financial incentives introduced - agric. prod. back to 1957 level and oil and natural gas prod. rockets
- Mao fears this retreat, calling it dangerous 'revisionism'
- Jan 1962 - Mao calls conference of 7000 cadres to discuss drift from communist principles - Shaoqui criticises Mao for avoiding blame so Mao simply accepts responsibility as Chairman
- Chen, Liu and Deng want enterprise and planning with private trade as a work incentive - Mao wants mass mobilisation to avoid bourgeois class emerging
- Summer 1962 - Mao attacks right of the party, asking if China are taking the 'capitalist or socialist road'
Comments
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report