Why is the Provisional Government often viewed as one that was reluctant to carry out reforms?
- Created by: book.of.wisdom
- Created on: 15-11-20 18:15
View mindmap
- Why is the Provisional Government often viewed as one that was reluctant to carry out reforms?
- Government
- focused on Constituent Assembly
- did not achieve this until Jan 1918
- postponed elections for Assembly
- Constituent Assembly could make more reforms to please peasants, soldiers and minorities
- focused on Constituent Assembly
- War
- decision to carry on in war
- lack of military reform = PG rejected by army
- WWI hindered reform
- land distribution issues ignored
- ignored peasant demands for land reform
- decision to carry on in war
- Society/ economy
- paid little attention to social /economic reform
- ignored demands
- ignored worker demands for an 8 hour day
- ignored peasant demands for land reform
- did make some reforms
- ended secret courts
- released political prisoners
- instigated freedom of the press
- Minorities
- PG did not solve the rise in nationalism
- PG slow to create Constituent Assembly where minority demands could be expressed dealt with
- PG did not always ignore the initiatives
- Government
Comments
No comments have yet been made