Towards a Command Economy 1917 - 1928
- Created by: Bigboi_Butterz
- Created on: 12-05-18 15:23
View mindmap
- Towards a Command Economy 1917 - 1928
- Nationalisation of Industry
- Marx was vague about the nature of a future communist society
- Communism needed an advanced economy, however it was unsophisticated and backward, less developed than Europe and shattered during WW1.
- Lenin called his economy 'state capitalism' as it was in between capitalism and communism, however country was not strong enough to implement full socialism
- Lenin's view of a socialist economy included; highly efficient, well educated, expert management, disciplined workers
- Nationalism took industry away from middle class owners and was run by National economy (Vesenkha)
- This ensured factories were well managed under control of well paid specialists, Co-ordinated economy to meet needs of new society
- Only large industry was nationalised, small industry left alone
- State capitalism was unpopular, little difference to before revolution. Many rejected in favour of workers control. Nonetheless it was enforced until the civil war
- Land reform introduced to win popularity, land was took from churches and aristocracy and given to peasants
- War Communism
- emergency economic measures created to ensure victory in civil war
- Designed to ensure; high production of war goods, efficient allocation of workers, high levels of food production
- Food dictatorships introduced; grain requisitioning (seized grain from peasants without payments), rationing (less food to rich)
- Labour discipline; 11 hour work days, compulsory work 16 - 50 year olds, harsh punishments for workers
- abolition of market; abolition of money (due to hyperinflation), abolition of private trade, complete nationalism, conscription
- Red army was supplied so won civil war, but led to economic collapse
- Requisition led to low agricultural output, industrial output low, workers fled to farms where they might find food (3 million to 1.2 million)
- Black market was used more 60% food came from it, workers stole
- Russian economy was near collapse, mass poverty occurred, lack of fuel, lack of food, 6 million died
- Political crisis occurred, peasants rebelled, sailors mutinied, government responded harshly
- In order to save revolution, Lenin was forced to accept economic compromised
- New Economic Policy
- NEP was introduced because; retain political power, economic retreat to protect political defeat, To revive the economy (increase grain production end famine), build socialism without foreign aid (no european revolution)
- Lenin believed war communism was the correct economic foundation, made peace with peasants, use capitalist methods to achieve communist goals
- The NEP ended war communism, created mixed economy; agriculture left to free market (taxed), small factories denationalised, large factories remained nationalised, money reintroduced
- Stable currency needed for factories, workshops and government run industry to make profit, people were expected to pay for services, e.g transport
- Inequality and widespread corruption arose, Nepmen profited, gambling, prostitution and drug dealing took place
- Industry grew slowly (more funding), but reached 1913 levels, build socialism with capitalist hands
- However Scissor crisis occurred as agriculture grew rapidly, industry slowly, a gap opened between farmers incomes and industrial prices
- Government subsidised industry, but meant little money could be spent on economy, NEP failed.
- NEP led to political and economic stability, no rapid industry growth, no support from left
- State Control of Industry and Agriculture
- Debate on correct policy to use when Industrialising Soviet Union
- Left; radical social policy, Right; continue NEP, Centre; back whatever worked
- Left wanted Dictatorship of industry; full collectivisation, low popularity with peasants
- Right wanted to build socialism with capitalist hands; industry growth would happen slowly, gave peasants independence and happy, but threatened a return to capitalist class
- Centre; whatever worked; practical position, could change approach
- Right wanted to build socialism with capitalist hands; industry growth would happen slowly, gave peasants independence and happy, but threatened a return to capitalist class
- Left congratulated war communism as being true socialism, NEP was lost sight, Right however called war communism extreme measure that caused Chaos and rebellion
- Right won economic debate until NEP failed, Stalin took left approach that was popular
- Economic policy went through a series of changes, showing the lack of detailed plan, war communism created political and economic crisis, NEP meant left wanted change, only caused slow growth, so Stalin initiated economic revolution.
- Nationalisation of Industry
Comments
No comments have yet been made