UK constitution 25 mark question
For and against argument for the UK constition from the mark scheme.
- Created by: Amal S
- Created on: 19-04-13 23:02
View mindmap
- 'The UK constitution is no longer fit for purpose'
- It doesn't conform to the modern democratic world
- It is excessively flexible which means that there is too much opportunity for a drift towards executive power
- The loss of public confidence in politics may be partly due to a lack of codified constitutional principles
- The sovereignty of parliament which largely replaces a codified constitution prevents individual rights being adequately protected
- The existence of prerogative powers is fundamentally undemocratic
- Its flexibility arising from its uncodified, unentrenched nature, means it can adapt to circumstances
- It does provide for strong decisive government
- The UK has enjoyed many years of stable government which suggests the constitution is effective. This cannot be said of many modern states which have a strong and codified constitutions
- The conservative arguments suggests a change to the constitution would have unknown consequences
Similar Government & Politics resources:
Teacher recommended
Comments
No comments have yet been made