The Cosmologcial Argument
Outline of the cosmological argument
- Created by: Chiangy14
- Created on: 06-01-15 20:16
View mindmap
- The Cosmologcial Argument
- Overveiw
- In favour of the existence of god
- Inductive - Aims to persudade
- Not deductive meaning it cannot prove its conclusion
- Conclusion is that the cause of the universe is what we call God
- In favour of the existence of god
- Conclusion is that the cause of the universe is what we call God
- Deductive - Conclusion can be drawn from a set of premises. Not other information
- Not deductive meaning it cannot prove its conclusion
- 'A posteriori' - Based on looking at evidence in the world around us
- 'A prori' - Based on knowledge or justification is independent of experience
- Why is there a universe at all?
- St Thomas Aquinus
- 13th Century monk
- Summa Theologica
- 5 ways/ 5 demonstrations in the rationality of belief of God
- 2. Motion
- 1. Causes
- 3. Contingency
- 1. Things in the world that are either in motion, caused or contingent.
- 2. Motion
- 1. Causes
- 2. These things require something else to move,cause, create them and so on
- This chain of movement, causation and contingency can't go back for ever
- They all meet at something that is necessary.
- Unmoved mover
- Uncasued cause
- Uncreated being
- They all meet at something that is necessary.
- This chain of movement, causation and contingency can't go back for ever
- Their existence is dependent on something else, didn't create themselves!
- 1. Things in the world that are either in motion, caused or contingent.
- Other two do not matter in the cosmological argument
- 5 ways/ 5 demonstrations in the rationality of belief of God
- Wrote famous books
- Summa Theologica
- 5 ways/ 5 demonstrations in the rationality of belief of God
- 3. Contingency
- 1. Things in the world that are either in motion, caused or contingent.
- 2. These things require something else to move,cause, create them and so on
- This chain of movement, causation and contingency can't go back for ever
- They all meet at something that is necessary.
- Unmoved mover
- Uncasued cause
- Uncreated being
- They all meet at something that is necessary.
- This chain of movement, causation and contingency can't go back for ever
- 2. These things require something else to move,cause, create them and so on
- Their existence is dependent on something else, didn't create themselves!
- 1. Things in the world that are either in motion, caused or contingent.
- Other two do not matter in the cosmological argument
- 3. Contingency
- 5 ways/ 5 demonstrations in the rationality of belief of God
- Summa Theologica
- Causation
- What caused me?
- My parents
- What caused my parents?
- So on and so forth
- What caused my parents?
- My parents
- law of cause and effect
- In the theory of evolution heading back through time what caused the original start(the big bang)?
- Cant go on forever and must be a first causes separate from the universe
- Not part of the universe although for this to happen there must be three criteria
- Not physical
- Spiritual
- Not time-bound
- Eternal
- Not-caused
- Necassary
- Not physical
- Not part of the universe although for this to happen there must be three criteria
- Cant go on forever and must be a first causes separate from the universe
- Reject infinite regress - which is that the universe has always existed and had not been created, somehow.
- What caused me?
- Copleston Vs Russell
- Copleston used Aquinas' 3rd way
- Things exist in the universe that are contingent
- Dependant on something else
- The universe is made entirely from contingent things
- The universe in which everything is contingent means that the universe itself is contingent but has no but does not contain within itself the reason for its own existence
- The universe need an external explanation which is an existent being which itself is self explanatory
- a being that must but cannon-not exist
- Necessary being which must be God
- a being that must but cannon-not exist
- Things exist in the universe that are contingent
- Russell
- Universe is self coherent does not need a external explanation
- Self coherent - The universe is logical and consists by itself. Doesn't need any proof or evidence from elsewhere
- The universe is brute fact
- 'the universe is just there, and that's all'
- Possible to accept infinite regress
- Not impossible it has a infinite future and past
- since each human has a mother then mother race has a mother
- Copleston's argument has holes in it
- Universe is self coherent does not need a external explanation
- Copleston used Aquinas' 3rd way
- Overveiw
- God
- Necassary
- Eternal
- Spiritual
- First cause is God
- God
- Copleston Vs Russell
- Copleston used Aquinas' 3rd way
- Things exist in the universe that are contingent
- Dependant on something else
- The universe is made entirely from contingent things
- The universe in which everything is contingent means that the universe itself is contingent but has no but does not contain within itself the reason for its own existence
- The universe need an external explanation which is an existent being which itself is self explanatory
- a being that must but cannon-not exist
- Necessary being which must be God
- a being that must but cannon-not exist
- Things exist in the universe that are contingent
- Russell
- Universe is self coherent does not need a external explanation
- Self coherent - The universe is logical and consists by itself. Doesn't need any proof or evidence from elsewhere
- The universe is brute fact
- 'the universe is just there, and that's all'
- Possible to accept infinite regress
- Not impossible it has a infinite future and past
- since each human has a mother then mother race has a mother
- Copleston's argument has holes in it
- Universe is self coherent does not need a external explanation
- Copleston used Aquinas' 3rd way
Comments
Report