Licenses and Proprietary Estoppel
- Created by: 22rkhan
- Created on: 23-04-24 12:07
View mindmap
- Licenses and PE
- Intro
- Enjoying right or privilege over land which belongs to another without any liability for trespass. No exclusive possession- You simply have the personal right to access/use the land on agreed terms. limited, precarious, temporary, and personal
- Thomas v Sorrell - 'dispensation of license passes no interest nor alters or transfers property.. only makes an action lawful
- Types:
- Contractual
- Next best from lease, intent to create legal intents + consideration, express or implied
- Tanner v Tanner - man permits mistress to live at his house with kids until they came of age, CA held implied contractual license (damages for breach)
- Contractual: Revocable
- Wood v Leadbitter - C bought ticket but evicted, held that reasonable so only damages
- Thompson v Park - headmaster entered contract where permitted to share school with licensor, evicted, held that revocable as cannot order S.P whre 2 people cannot stay peacefully together
- Irrevocable: Verrall v Yarmouth - Council under conservatives in contract to allow NF to hold annual conference, labor refused = Breach of contract and SP ordered as damages not adequate here (nowhere to host) = look at construction of contract, some cant be revoked on facts
- Thompson v Park - headmaster entered contract where permitted to share school with licensor, evicted, held that revocable as cannot order S.P whre 2 people cannot stay peacefully together
- Hurst v Picture - C went to film and forcefully evicted, held in his favour as coupled with interest (this is wrong, no property right)
- Hurst v Picture and equity - Judicature Acts consider equity, injunction to restrain D from breach = Winter Garden implied term that cant be revoked (reversed)
- Wood v Leadbitter - C bought ticket but evicted, held that reasonable so only damages
- Next best from lease, intent to create legal intents + consideration, express or implied
- Bare
- license to occupy or use land with no consideration, can be revoked (wood v Leadbitter)
- Reasonable time to leave: Winter Garden Theatre, Hampstead garden, Parker v Parker
- license to occupy or use land with no consideration, can be revoked (wood v Leadbitter)
- Contractual
- Enjoying right or privilege over land which belongs to another without any liability for trespass. No exclusive possession- You simply have the personal right to access/use the land on agreed terms. limited, precarious, temporary, and personal
- Intro
Comments
No comments have yet been made