Evaluate the extent to which the US constitution is anti-democratic.

?
  • Created by: wanjikar
  • Created on: 09-06-23 13:11
View mindmap
  • Evaluate the extent to which the US constitution is anti-democratic. 
    • Democratic
      • Federalism
        • E.G., California legalised cannabis in 2016
        • responsive and representative government at state level
        • indidvidual states contain their own constitutions with different laws and practices
        • expands the rights of American citizens
      • 1st Amendment allows for a pluralist democracy
        • allows wide range of special interest groups that influence the legislative process
          • E.G., NRA and Planned Parenthood
        • allow for redress of grievances via the federal courts
        • allows for minority groups to be represented
        • abused by corporate interests
          • Big Pharma has two lobbyists for each Congressperson
    • Anti-Democratic
      • Gridlock
        • The President is elected with a mandate but unable to fulfill it because of Congress
          • e.g., Biden couldn't pass the Build Back Better bill
          • Trump couldn't secure funding for the Mexican border
        • the nature of the constitution needing bipartisanship for real change leads to gridlock due to partisanship
        • the system ignores the will of the people
        • gridlock is a result of partisanship not the Constitution
      • Imperial Judiciary
        • controversial issues are decided by unelected judges
          • e.g., Roe v Wade and Obergefell v Hodges (2015)
        • the judiciary is also the least checked branch of government
        • decides public policy which should be reserved for the other brnanches
        • un-democratic because of the constittuion to protect it from populism and allows, liberal democracy and civil liberties

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Government & Politics resources:

See all Government & Politics resources »See all Constitutional frameworks of US government resources »