Bodhisattva legitimacy in Buddhism
- Created by: CG24601
- Created on: 07-05-19 17:54
View mindmap
- “The concept of the Bodhisattva is a legitimate concept for all Buddhists.” Evaluate this view.
- Theravada: For
- Theravada Buddhists do refer to the Bodhisattva
- The Buddha himself was referred to as a Bodhisattva before is awakening
- The Bodhisattva is not the ideal and archtype in the way it is for Mahayana
- Theravada Buddhists do refer to the Bodhisattva
- Mahayana
- State their scriptures are the second turning of the Dharma wheel and therefore proclaim a more universal path
- the Bodhisattva's path is much longer and more complex to understand for the sake of sentient beings
- the concept of Bodhisattva is in line with the Buddha's teachings
- the link between wisdom and compassion founded on pratityasamut-pad and therefore a logical development of key Buddhist ideas
- Legitimate for each expression of Buddhism
- no conflict at all between the paths as they stand individually, its only when a comparison is drawn that debate sparks
- Surely the issue of legitimacy is only relevant to the tradition it comes from
- the Bodhisattva is a legitimate concept in Mahayana Buddhism much like the Arhat in Theravada
- Surely the issue of legitimacy is only relevant to the tradition it comes from
- no conflict at all between the paths as they stand individually, its only when a comparison is drawn that debate sparks
- The claims made are the same, just seen in different ways
- The Bodhisattva is enlightened in not accepting full enlightenment and returning to save all other sentient beings
- The Arhat is enlightened and equally concerned with his or her dealings with humanity.
- Ultimately, their goals are the same in that they both wish to eliminate suffering and aspire to enlightenment
- more positive form of comparison? legitimises both paths as following the way of the Buddha
- Theravada: Against
- the Bodhisattva path isn't mentioned nor promoted as superior to or an alternative to the Arhat path in the Pali Canon
- Also no reference in Theravada texts stating this was his goal
- The Arhat would claim to be equally compassion-ate despite being more introverted and concerned with personal spiritual developments than those of countless other beings
- the Bodhisattva path isn't mentioned nor promoted as superior to or an alternative to the Arhat path in the Pali Canon
- Theravada: For
- the Bodhisattva path isn't mentioned nor promoted as superior to or an alternative to the Arhat path in the Pali Canon
- Also no reference in Theravada texts stating this was his goal
Comments
No comments have yet been made